Rifa Ardian Fahreza
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Harmonisasi Hukum Kewarganegaraan, Perkawinan Campuran, dan Hak Waris: Perspektif Komparatif Hukum Perdata dan Islam Nirmala Suci Paramesti; Afthina Aulya Fatma; Rifa Ardian Fahreza
Majelis: Jurnal Hukum Indonesia Vol. 2 No. 4 (2025): November : Majelis : Jurnal Hukum Indonesia
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/majelis.v2i4.1194

Abstract

Mixed marriages are a social phenomenon that is increasingly prevalent with globalization and mobility between countries. The problems arising from mixed marriages not only concern social aspects but also impact the citizenship status and inheritance rights of the parties. This study aims to analyze the legal consequences of mixed marriages on citizenship and inheritance rights from the perspectives of civil law and Islamic law. The method used is normative-comparative research with a legislative and conceptual approach. The results reveal fundamental differences between civil law and Islamic law in regulating citizenship and inheritance rights in mixed marriages. Civil law emphasizes administrative and national aspects, while Islamic law focuses on religious and lineage aspects. These differences lead to variations in the recognition of citizenship and inheritance of property, potentially creating legal uncertainty for the parties. Therefore, harmonization between civil law and Islamic law is essential to create legal certainty and justice, particularly in the context of inter-national and inter-religious marriages in Indonesia
Pembatalan Perkawinan di Pengadilan Agama: Rekonstruksi Keabsahan Hukum dan Keadilan Sosial Berbasis Pancasila dan Islamic Sociological Jurisprudence Theory Rifa Ardian Fahreza; Anisah Eka Dewi Saputri; Serlina Atailla Widya Fatihah
Presidensial: Jurnal Hukum, Administrasi Negara, dan Kebijakan Publik Vol. 3 No. 2 (2026): Juni: Presidensial : Jurnal Hukum, Administrasi Negara, dan Kebijakan Publik
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/presidensial.v3i2.1745

Abstract

Marriage annulment in Religious Courts has been trapped in rigid legal formalism, giving rise to decision disparities, terminological errors between "null and void" and "voidable", as well as the neglect of the rights of wives and children. This normative legal research with a library research approach aims to reconstruct legal validity and social justice based on Pancasila and the Islamic Sociological Jurisprudence Theory. The results show that the construction of Articles 22-28 of the Marriage Law jo. Articles 70-76 of the Compilation of Islamic Law still leaves a gap between formal legal certainty and substantive justice, reflected in decision disparities between courts and the imposition of mediation excluded by PERMA No. 1 of 2016 which has never succeeded. This study offers a reconstruction with three parameters: marriage validity requires good faith and social consequences; judges need ex officio authority to annul a marriage when tadlīs (identity falsification) is proven; and mediation must be abolished. Pancasila is reconstructed as a rechtsidee (legal ideal) that bridges the formalism of Islamic law and constitutional supremacy, with a recommendation for judicial discretion to provide compensation to wives in good faith based on maqāṣid al-sharī‘ah. This reconstruction is expected to serve as a reference for law enforcers and academics in creating marriage laws that are fair, dignified, and aligned with the values of Indonesian-ness