Damanik, Nurliana
Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Dialektis Gademer Damanik, Nurliana
AL-HIKMAH:Jurnal Theosofi dan Peradaban Islam Vol 5, No 2 (2023): AL-HIKMAH : Jurnal Theosofi dan Peradaban Islam
Publisher : UIN Sumatera Utara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51900/alhikmah.v5i2.19391

Abstract

Hans-Georg Gadamer is one of the thinkers who falls into the group of ontological hermeneutics. Gadamer matured the idea of consciousness, interpretation of texts and phenomena and discovered the philosophical problem of developing an ontology of understanding objectively in progress. Hermeneutics is always related to language. Gadamer stated that language is the modus operandi of humans' way of being in the world and a form that seems to embrace the entire constitution of the world. For Gadamer, language is time, human existence, being, and truth. Mastery of a language and its unique set of experiences and traditions is the main requirement for the disclosure of ontology itself. The important point of Gadamer's hermeneutic theory refers to the hermeneutic circle regarding dialectical understanding. Dialectical understanding is a process of historical awareness, born due to the involvement of the dimensions of time, namely past, present and future. Truth is achieved when there is a fusion of the horizons of the text, actors and interpreters (fusion horizon). In this understanding, the involvement of language becomes very important. Interpretation is not just reproductive work but rather productive understanding, giving birth to new interpretations and meanings. Gadamer formulated two forms of understanding, namely understanding the truth content and understanding the intention. Understanding content means understanding the meaning contained in the propositions and substance of the text material. Understanding intention means understanding the conditions or situations behind a phenomenon or text. Understanding this second aspect then became Gadamer's attention as an awareness of historical understanding. Historical understanding is obtained through the proposition of historicity, where the awareness of the subject (text interpreter) in carrying out analysis (text interpretation) is required to be inseparable from the study of historical experiences related to the text. Understanding the text is understanding history with the principles of space and time).Keywords: Gademer, Dialectics, Hermeneutics, Understanding.
Filsafat Cinta Menurut Pemikiran Hamka Damanik, Nurliana
AL-HIKMAH:Jurnal Theosofi dan Peradaban Islam Vol 7, No 1 (2025): AL-HIKMAH : Jurnal Theosofi dan Peradaban Islam
Publisher : UIN Sumatera Utara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51900/alhikmah.v7i1.25241

Abstract

Prof. Dr. Haji Abdul Malik Karim Amrullah or often called Buya Hamka. Buya Hamka is an Indonesian intellectual figure who has down-to-earth thoughts and a vision of the future. Happiness or joy is a state of mind or feeling characterized by sufficiency to pleasure, love, satisfaction, enjoyment, or intense joy. Various approaches to philosophy, religion, psychology, and biology have been carried out to define happiness and determine its source. Happiness is the inner realm and not the physical realm. Because of the inner and not physical nature, happiness can be felt by anyone regardless of their social background. Happiness can also be felt by the rich, the poor, officials or ordinary people. This is what our religion teaches that happiness and material things are different, not directly proportional. It is not necessary that every poor person cannot meet the criteria for happiness, it is not necessary that rich people always feel happiness. Al-ghina ghina an-nafs, the real wealth is this inner wealth.
PEMAHAMAN NILAI-NILAI AJARAN AGAMA (ANALISIS PENDEKATAN TEORI KONFLIK DAN TEORI FUNGSIONAL) Damanik, Nurliana
Studia Sosia Religia Vol 7, No 1 (2024)
Publisher : UIN Sumatera Utara Medan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51900/ssr.v7i1.20907

Abstract

Religion has two main forces, namely as a factor of the power of unifying power (centripetal) and a factor of strength of divisive power (centrifugal). In a pluralist, multiethnic society, language and religion are presented as centripetal factors and also function as social control and motivators of development with a human dimension. Even religion also acts as an instrument of glue for the integrity of the nation. The critical function of religion is necessary not only to sensitize the mindset and behavior of individuals in society, but also to provide direction to development concepts and planning. Conflict theory arose as a reaction to the emergence of functional structural theory. Functional theory in sociology is one of the perspectives in sociology that views society as a system consisting of parts that are interrelated with one another. This theory views that society is static or in a balanced change, where each element of society has a role in maintaining stability. While conflict theory is a situation that everyone does not want because it harms material and nonmaterial. Marx and Weber categorically rejected the idea that society tends to lead to basic consensus or harmony, in which the ongoing structure of society works for the good of everyone. From these two things, it can be concluded that conflict is a social phenomenon that is present in social life, so conflict is inherent, meaning that conflict will always exist in every time and space, anywhere and anytime. In this view, society is an arena of conflict or an arena of conflict and integration that always takes place. Therefore, conflict and social integration are symptoms that always fill every social life, and the function and role of religion needs to be maintained in social and state life as the main force.