Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Hukum Inconcreto
Ratna Amalia, Cindy
Unknown Affiliation
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

 1 
Penyelesaian sengketa Perbankan Syariah di Luar Pengadilan Agama Ratna Amalia, Cindy; Nurul Hidayah, Astika
Jurnal Hukum In Concreto Vol. 3 No. 1 (2024): Jurnal Hukum In Concreto Volume 3 Nomor 1 2024
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Harapan Bangsa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35960/inconcreto.v3i1.1294

Abstract

Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 21 of 2008 concerning Sharia Banking still raises problems in the process of resolving cases within the scope of Sharia Banks. The scope of the Religious Courts and the General Courts have the same authority in resolving Islamic Banking disputes in Indonesia. This research was conducted to explore and analyze the absolute authority of judicial institutions in Indonesia in resolving cases related to Islamic banking in Indonesia. This research is normative juridical in nature by approaching the applicable laws and regulations associated with the legal issues studied. Based on the research, it is found that the District Court does not have absolute authority in resolving Islamic banking disputes. The settlement of Islamic Banking disputes according to Law Number 21 of 2008 concerning Islamic Banking can be done by choosing one of the paths, namely through litigation within the Religious Court, and secondly, non-litigation can be done by means of deliberation, mediation, the National Sharia Arbitration Board (BASYARNAS) or other authorized arbitration institutions, and the General Court.  Keywords: authority, dispute resolution, islamic banking
Co-Authors Nurul Hidayah, Astika