Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Reformasi Hukum Trisakti
Alvalaneda
Unknown Affiliation
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

 1 
Perbandingan Penerapan Notifikasi Terkait Tindakan Akuisisi Berdasarkan Hukum Persaingan Usaha di Indonesia dan Singapura: Alvalaneda; Dian Purnamasari
Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol 5 No 4 (2023): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/refor.v5i4.18555

Abstract

Indonesia’s competition law comprehends acquisition procedures in article 29 of Law No.5/1999 jo. Article 5 of Government Regulation No.57/2010 and KPPU guidelines about the acquisition, meanwhile Singapore has the same regulations through Article 54 of the SCA 2004 along with CCCS guidelines on M&A. Both countries apply different acquisition regulations as well as the application of notification concept, so that it’s become a problem to analyze KPPU Juridical Verdict No.30/KPPU-M/2020 and CCCS NID Case Number: 500/01/18 to know the similarities and differences. Therefore, this research used juridical normative method by examining secondary data and analyzing it qualitatively. The result of the research shows that there are differences in acquisition regulation such as differences in notification regime, threshold for notification, valuation method, and the use of public consultation in Singapore while the similarities include consideration of financial penalties and costs assessment. It can be concluded that both countries apply different notification regime, and Singapore not only use written law but also unwritten law, meanwhile Indonesia only use written law.
Co-Authors Dian Purnamasari