Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

Sengketa Tapal Batas Antar Daerah Otonom di Indonesia: Studi Kasus di Provinsi Riau Mahmuzar - Mahmuzar
Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM Vol. 25 No. 2: MEI 2018
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20885/iustum.vol25.iss2.art10

Abstract

This study aimed to find out about the causes of boundary disputes between autonomous regions in Indonesia, especially in Riau Province, and the procedures for the settlement. This was a socio-legal research, i.e. analyzing the law that exists in a community. This study used both primary and secondary legal materials, obtained through field surveys, library research, and interviews with key informants. The results of this study showed that the boundary disputes between autonomous regions in Indonesia, especially in Riau Province, are caused by: First, the boundary markers are located far from each other; Second, there is custody of government and citizenship administrative services; Third, the interests of capital owners and; Fourth, political interests. The settlement of the boundary disputes between autonomous regions in Indonesia, especially in Riau Province, is through the decision of the state officials/administrative authorities and court decisions i.e.: decision of the State Administrative Court and the Constitutional Court
“PEMBANGKANGAN” KEPALA DAERAH KEPADA MENTERI DI INDONESIA PADA ERA OTONOMI DAERAH Mahmuzar Mahmuzar
Jurnal EL-RIYASAH Vol 13, No 2 (2022): Desember 2022
Publisher : Sultan Syarif Kasim State Islamic University, Riau

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24014/jel.v13i2.19913

Abstract

The relationship between the local and central governments in the era of regional autonomy should be harmonious because the local government is a subsystem of the national government's that final responsibility lies with the President. In addition, one of the objectives of regional autonomy is to create harmonious relations between the central and local governments. But in fact, there are several regional heads in the Unitary State of the Republic of Indonesia which carried out "defiance" to state minister. The regional head who conducts "insubordination" to the state minister in the Unitary State of the Republic of Indonesia, cannot be dismissed from his position as regional head because Act Number 23 of 2014 concerning Regional Government does not explicitly regulate it as one the reasons regional heads can dismiss from his position, except that disobedience is carried out by the regional head in order not to carry out a national strategic program launched by the central government through non-departmental ministries/agencies.
MODEL NEGARA KESATUAN REPUBLIK INDONESIA DI ERA REFORMASI Mahmuzar, Mahmuzar
Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan Vol. 50, No. 2
Publisher : UI Scholars Hub

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Article 1 Paragraph (1) of the 1945 Constitution stated that the state of Indonesia shall be a unitary state, with the form of a Republic and in article 37 paragraph (5) is affirmed that the form of the unitary state of the Republic of Indonesia may not be amended. There are two kinds of unitary state, namely unitary state with centralistic system and unitary state with decentralized system. The unitary state with decentralized system has five variants, namely; (1) unitary state with centralized decentralized system; (2) unitary state with decentralized system that decentralistic; (3), unitary state with proportional decentralized system; (4) unitary state with federalistic decentralized system, and (5) unitary state with confederate decentralized system. Out of the five unitary state models with the decentralized system, Unitary State of the Republic of Indonesia in this reform era is unitary state with federalistic decentralized system when the the enactment of Law No. 22 of 1999 and Law No. 32 of 2004, and unitary state with centralized decentralization system when the implemented of Law No. 23 of 2014 concerning Local Government.
Reformulation of General Election Arrangement (Efforts to Avoid Loss of Life among General Election Officers) Mahmuzar, Mahmuzar
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 24 No. 1 (2025): Pena Justisia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/pj.v24i1.5395

Abstract

AbstractThe objectives of the current study are to: (1) understand and analyze whether the general election arrangement, stipulated in Law No. 7 of 2017 on General Election, contributed to the deaths of general election officers, particularly voting organizer group (Kelompok Penyelenggara Pemungutan Suara – KPPS) members, during the voting, tallying, and recapitulation stages; (2) to formulate solutions the government should take so that in the following election no general election officers, particularly voting organizer group (KPPS) members, loss their life during the voting, tallying, and recapitulation stages. The current study is normative legal research that requires data in the form of primary legal materials and secondary legal materials obtained through literature study. Once data were collected, they were classified and analyzed in a descriptive manner. Based on the research results, it can be concluded that: (1) the general election arrangement stipulated in Law No. 7 of 2017 on General Election did contribute to the deaths of general election officers, particularly KPPS members, during the voting, tallying, and recapitulation stages on account of excessive work load and lack of rest. As a result, some KPPS members experienced extreme fatigue to a degree in which those who had chronic diseases suffered relapses and ultimately passed away; (2) to avoid loss of general election officers life in future general election, a reformulation of the general election arrangement by lawmakers is necessary through the following process: first, reseparate the implementation of the legislative election and the presidential/vice-presidential election; second, maintain the current simultaneous election with some improvements; third, hold two separate concurrent elections, i.e., concurrent national election and concurrent local election. Out of the three options above, the most plausible alternatives are the second and third since the first option contradicts the ruling of the Constitutional Court. Keywords: avoid, loss of life, general election officers.