Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Perbandingan Hukum Tentang Pelecehan Seksual Terhadap Hewan Dengan Kuhp Indonesia Dan Kuhp Laos Criminal Code Pamungkas, Sekar Langit Jatu; Kuswardani, Kuswardani
Prosiding University Research Colloquium Proceeding of The 14th University Research Colloquium 2021: Bidang MIPA dan SOSHUM
Publisher : Konsorsium Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat Perguruan Tinggi Muhammadiyah 'Aisyiyah (PTMA) Koordinator Wilayah Jawa Tengah - DIY

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The Criminal Code (KUHP), which is a legacy of the Dutch colonial government, is nolonger relevant to changes and developments in society, especially if it is related to thediversity of types of sexual harassment as deviant sexual behavior which no longer makesfellow humans victims but has extended to a number of animal species. A specialcomparison is needed to find out the legal arrangements regarding sexual harassment ofanimals in order to find out whether Indonesia's legal system is better or worse. Laos isone of Indonesia's neighboring countries which is within the scope of the Southeast Asiaregion where the legal system used is also different and can be used as an appropriatecomparison to know in this study. So that it can be compared with each other whichcriminal law system is better in achieving justice as one of the goals of implementing alaw. The research method used in this research is the normative juridical law researchmethod. The results of the research show that the provisions of the criminal law rules ineach KUHP which are enforced as a source of criminal law for the Indonesian state andcriminal regulations in Laos as a comparison, it is known that in their application, bothThe applicable criminal law system does not clearly and specifically regulate sexualharassment behavior against animals.
IMPLEMENTATION OF THE MOU HELSINKI ON CRIMINAL LAW POLICY IN NANGGROE ACEH DARUSSALAM (NAD) Pamungkas, Sekar Langit Jatu; Putra, Denmark Erlangga; Yunandeva, Valiantnuja Washfaa; Malik, Akbar Fahrudin; Luqman, Nur Faishal
Khairun Law Journal Volume 5 Issue 2, March 2022
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Khairun University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33387/klj.v5i2.5437

Abstract

Aceh, as one of the autonomous regions in the context of the Unitary State of the Republic of Indonesia, in the practice of implementing Local Government, repeatedly not only positions the type and hierarchy of laws and regulations following Law No. 12 of 2011 on the Establishment of Laws and Regulations but also positions the Helsinki MoU as one of the legal sources. The thing that is the practice in this writing is related to how the implementation of the Helsinki MoU in criminal law policy in Aceh. Research methods are conducted with normative legal research methods and prescriptive research. Data collection in this study is done through literature research. Data analysis is done with qualitative analysis; the process of data analysis and using legal data is also possible to use non-legal data. This study showed that after the MoU of peace between the Indonesian government and GAM was marked on August 15, 2005, in Helsinki, Finland, 24 governments then passed Law No. 11 of 2006 on the aceh government. This law is a political commitment of the Indonesian government in following up on the results of the peace agreement in Helsinki. One of the authorities (autonomy/self-government) granted in the law is to implement Islamic sharia in Aceh in a kaffah both in terms of worship, education, muamalat, shiar, civil law, and criminal law. While implementing the Helsinki MoU is, the regulation related to Jinayat (Criminal Law) has strengthened. Other judicial institutions are also concerned about implementing criminal law in Aceh, although the rules about Criminal Law still cause debate.
IMPLEMENTATION OF THE MOU HELSINKI ON CRIMINAL LAW POLICY IN NANGGROE ACEH DARUSSALAM (NAD) Pamungkas, Sekar Langit Jatu; Putra, Denmark Erlangga; Yunandeva, Valiantnuja Washfaa; Malik, Akbar Fahrudin; Luqman, Nur Faishal
Khairun Law Journal Volume 5 Issue 2, March 2022
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Khairun University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33387/klj.v5i2.5437

Abstract

Aceh, as one of the autonomous regions in the context of the Unitary State of the Republic of Indonesia, in the practice of implementing Local Government, repeatedly not only positions the type and hierarchy of laws and regulations following Law No. 12 of 2011 on the Establishment of Laws and Regulations but also positions the Helsinki MoU as one of the legal sources. The thing that is the practice in this writing is related to how the implementation of the Helsinki MoU in criminal law policy in Aceh. Research methods are conducted with normative legal research methods and prescriptive research. Data collection in this study is done through literature research. Data analysis is done with qualitative analysis; the process of data analysis and using legal data is also possible to use non-legal data. This study showed that after the MoU of peace between the Indonesian government and GAM was marked on August 15, 2005, in Helsinki, Finland, 24 governments then passed Law No. 11 of 2006 on the aceh government. This law is a political commitment of the Indonesian government in following up on the results of the peace agreement in Helsinki. One of the authorities (autonomy/self-government) granted in the law is to implement Islamic sharia in Aceh in a kaffah both in terms of worship, education, muamalat, shiar, civil law, and criminal law. While implementing the Helsinki MoU is, the regulation related to Jinayat (Criminal Law) has strengthened. Other judicial institutions are also concerned about implementing criminal law in Aceh, although the rules about Criminal Law still cause debate.