Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Referendum Deposisi: Jurnal Publikasi Ilmu Hukum
Abellio Jhose Sitompul
Unknown Affiliation
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Analisis Hukum Atas Penerapan Hukuman Mati Terhadap Tindak Pidana Korupsi di Indonesia Dihubungkan dengan Undang Nomor 39 Tahun 1999 Tentang Hak Asasi Manusia Abellio Jhose Sitompul
Referendum : Jurnal Hukum Perdata dan Pidana Vol. 2 No. 2 (2025): Juni : Referendum : Jurnal Hukum Perdata dan Pidana
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/referendum.v2i2.882

Abstract

This study is motivated by the ongoing debate regarding the application of the death penalty to perpetrators of corruption in Indonesia, particularly in relation to the protection of human rights as stipulated in Law Number 39 of 1999. The purpose of this research is to explain the extent to which the death penalty can be appropriately and proportionally applied to corruptors while considering human rights principles. This study employs a normative legal approach focused on the analysis of statutory regulations and relevant legal literature. The data is analyzed using a qualitative juridical method, emphasizing a normative review of applicable positive law. The findings reveal a discrepancy between the imposition of the death penalty for corruption crimes and the right to life guaranteed by Indonesia’s human rights legal instruments. The implication of this research highlights the need to reconsider the policy of capital punishment for corrupt practices to ensure alignment with the principles of justice, humanity, and respect for human rights within the national legal system.
Pendelegasian Kewenangan Penuntutan berdasarkan Pasal 18 Ayat 1 Undang - Undang Kejaksaan Dihubungkan dengan Pendelegasian Kewenangan Undang - Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2014 tentang Administrasi Pemerintahan Addrey Ben Vitahula Sihaloho; Abellio Jhose Sitompul
Deposisi: Jurnal Publikasi Ilmu Hukum Vol. 4 No. 2 (2026): Juni : Deposisi: Jurnal Publikasi Ilmu Hukum
Publisher : International Forum of Researchers and Lecturers

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59581/deposisi.v4i2.6263

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the mechanism of delegation of prosecutorial authority within Indonesia’s criminal justice system and to examine its conformity with the principles of delegation of authority in administrative law. The Prosecution Service, as an institution adhering to the single prosecution system, plays a central role in law enforcement, with the Attorney General holding the highest prosecutorial authority. In practice, such authority is delegated to Public Prosecutors as part of efforts to enhance the effectiveness of law enforcement, while remaining grounded in the principle of legality and national law enforcement policies. This research employs a normative juridical method by combining a statutory and conceptual approaches, through the analysis of the Criminal Procedure Code, the Law on the Prosecution Service, and the Law on Government Administration. The findings confirm that the delegation of prosecutorial authority is normatively consistent with the principles of delegation, particularly in relation to the transfer of responsibility and accountability to the recipient of authority. However, in its implementation, challenges remain, particularly the disharmony of authority among law enforcement institutions such as the Corruption Eradication Commission and military courts, which may undermine the single prosecution system.
Co-Authors Addrey Ben Vitahula Sihaloho