Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Istinbath : Jurnal Hukum aktivisme: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, Politik dan Sosial Indonesia
Dwita Tarisa Putri
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Social Sciences Other

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Ketidakpastian Hukum Pengaturan Naming Rights pada Fasilitas Publik yang Berstatus Cagar Budaya dalam Perspektif Hukum Positif di Indonesia Hana Aurelia; Dwita Tarisa Putri; Zahra Aurrelia
Aktivisme: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, Politik dan Sosial Indonesia Vol. 2 No. 4 (2025): Oktober: Aktivisme: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, Politik dan Sosial Indonesia
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/aktivisme.v2i4.1325

Abstract

The practice of naming rights through trademark licensing agreements on public facilities has become a common commercialisation strategy in Indonesia. However, when the object of naming rights is a public facility with cultural heritage status, legal uncertainty arises due to the absence of specific regulations governing the intersection between Law No. 20 of 2016 concerning Trademarks and Geographical Indications and Law No. 11 of 2010 concerning Cultural Heritage. The objective of this study is to analyse the regulation of naming rights on public facilities with cultural heritage status and to identify any differences in the application of trademark law in the cases of Semarang Tawang Station and Cirebon Kejaksan Station. The study employs a normative juridical method, utilising secondary data collection techniques and is supported by tertiary legal materials, employing a legislative, analytical and comparative approach. The results of the study indicate a discrepancy in the regulatory framework for naming rights concerning cultural heritage, leading to legal ambiguity due to inconsistent implementation. This is exemplified by the contrasting outcomes at Semarang Tawang Station, where the naming rights agreement with Bank Jateng was successfully executed, and at Cirebon Kejaksan Station, where the agreement was terminated despite both stations possessing cultural heritage status. The study recommends the introduction of comprehensive special regulations to harmonise the protection of exclusive trademark rights with the preservation of the identity and historical value of cultural heritage sites.  
Regulating Digital Privacy in Indonesia: The Practice of Data Subject Rights and Controller Duties in the FotoYu App Dwita Tarisa Putri
Istinbath : Jurnal Hukum Vol 22 No 02 (2025): Istinbath: Jurnal Hukum
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) Jurai Siwo Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32332/istinbath.v22i02.11448

Abstract

The practice of personal data protection in artificial intelligence (AI)-based marketplace applications that utilize facial recognition technology (FRT) in Indonesia has not been comprehensively studied. This study analyzes the implementation of data subject rights and the fulfillment of data controller obligations by FotoYu under Law Number 27 of 2022 concerning Personal Data Protection (PDP Law). This study employs a normative juridical method, utilizing primary legal sources such as legislation, secondary sources including scholarly literature and doctrine, and tertiary materials as supporting references. The findings indicate that FotoYu and its Creators have not fully met the core obligations of data controllers, particularly regarding explicit consent, transparency, and effective data deletion mechanisms. Additional challenges arise from inaccurate FRT performance, limited regulatory frameworks on FRT and AI, the absence of implementing regulations for the PDP Law, and a lack of a dedicated data protection authority. This study contributes by providing a normative interpretation of PDP Law provisions in the context of AI-based FRT platforms and offers policy recommendations, including strengthening regulations specific to FRT and AI, accelerating PDP Law implementation regulations, and establishing an independent data protection authority to ensure effective oversight and law enforcement in Indonesia.
Co-Authors Hana Aurelia Zahra Aurrelia