Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan
Mardiya, Nuzul Qur'aini
Unknown Affiliation
Economics, Econometrics & Finance Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
PENGAWASAN PERILAKU HAKIM MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI OLEH DEWAN ETIK Mardiya, Nuzul Qur'aini
Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Vol 6 No 1 (2017)
Publisher : Pusat Strategi Kebijakan Hukum dan Peradilan Mahkamah Agung RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/jhp.6.1.2017.25-40

Abstract

The Constitutional Court has a code of ethics and behavior of judges the constitution as the legal basis to carry out profession ethics. Due to his duty, judge of the constitution had potentially breaking the code of conduct and behavior of judges. In order to oversee the conduct of judges the constitution formed The Board of Ethics Judge Constitution (DE-HK) who has authority to check and give decision regarding of the reports on complaints and information through the media/the community related to alleged violations the code of conduct and behavior of judges the constitution as well as a violation of law constitutional court. The Board would have the authority to impose sanctions verbally and if the offense heavy, the board recommended the formation of an assembly of honor of constitutional court and make propose of the suspension of the judge the constitution, and if not proven The Board rehabilitates judge that concerned. This study is done in a juridical manner normative by looking at an object or target of regulation research, legislation and materials law other related supervision the conduct of judges the constitution by the board. Hence, within the revision on constitutional court law in National Legislation Program, it's important to do institutional strengthening the board of conduct and to ripen position the tribunal honor judges to carries out surveillance and checks for violation code of ethics and behavior by the judges.Keywords: code of ethics and behavior, The Board Of Ethics Judge Constitution, judge, supervision
PENGATURAN PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN KORPORASI DALAM TINDAK PIDANA LINGKUNGAN HIDUP / THE REGULATION OF CORPORATE LIABILITY IN ENVIRONMENTAL CRIMINAL ACT Mardiya, Nuzul Qur'aini
Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Vol 7 No 3 (2018)
Publisher : Pusat Strategi Kebijakan Hukum dan Peradilan Mahkamah Agung RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/jhp.7.3.2018.483-502

Abstract

Kebakaran hutan dan lahan khususnya lahan gambut selama ini menjadi perhatian pemerintah secara nasional dan lintas negara. Penegakan hukum tindak pidana lingkungan bagi korporasi yang melakukan pembakaran hutan dan lahan menjadi hal penting karena berdampak pada kerusakan lingkungan dan gangguan kesehatan. Ketentuan mengenai tanggung jawab bagi korporasi dalam tindak pidana lingkungan telah diatur dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 40 Tahun 2007 tentang Perseroan Terbatas yang menyatakan Direktur Perusahaan tidak dapat melepaskan dirinya dari pertanggungjawaban pidana dalam hal perusahaan yang dipimpinnya mencemari dan atau merusak lingkungan. Senada dengan itu, Undang-Undang Nomor 32 Tahun 2009 tentang Perlindungan dan Pengelolaan Lingkungan Hidup juga mengatur bila pertanggungjawaban dapat dikenakan kepada badan hukum dan para pengurusnya secara bersama-sama, dalam hal kegiatan dan/atau usaha korporasi tersebut menyebabkan terjadinya pencemaran dan atau kerusakan lingkungan hidup. UU PPLH ini kemudian didukung dengan perangkat aturan penanganan perkara di Mahkamah Agung yakni Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia Nomor 13 Tahun 2016 tentang Tata Cara Penanganan Perkara Tindak Pidana Oleh Korporasi dan Keputusan Ketua Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia Nomor: 36/KMA/SK/II/2013 tentang Pemberlakuan Pedoman Penanganan Perkara Lingkungan Hidup.Land and forest fire especially peatland so far had been a serious concern for the government that pay  attention nationally and cross country. Law enforcement of environment for a criminal that burn forests and land areas are important because resulted in an impairment of health and environmental damage. Provisions on corporate accountability for the environment in a criminal offense has been regulated in Law Number 40 of 2007 on Limited Liability Company that had been said the company could not set them free from criminal responsibility in terms of companies made pollution and damage the environment. Law Number 32 of 2009 on The Protection And Environmental Management (PPLH) also regulate if accountability may be subject to the body of laws and the managers together, in activities and/or corporate business if it causes the pollution and or damage environment. PPLH Law were then supported with a device rules of case handling in the Supreme Court such as Supreme Court Regulation Number 13 of 2016 on the procedures for case handling of a criminal act in corporate and Decree of Chief Justice of The Republic of Indonesia Number: 36/KMA/SK/II/2013 about the guidelines of case handling in environmental issue.
Co-Authors