Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

The Association of Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitors With Improved Clinical Outcomes in Heart Failure: A Systematic Review of Landmark Clinical Trials Anggreini Oktavia Trisno; Chelsia Ernes
The International Journal of Medical Science and Health Research Vol. 18 No. 4 (2025): The International Journal of Medical Science and Health Research
Publisher : International Medical Journal Corp. Ltd

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70070/bwk49p78

Abstract

Introduction: Heart failure (HF) represents a major global health burden characterized by significant morbidity, mortality, and healthcare expenditure. While established therapies exist for HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), effective treatments for HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) have been elusive. Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors, initially developed as anti-hyperglycemic agents, have emerged as a transformative therapeutic class for HF. This systematic review synthesizes the evidence from landmark clinical trials on the efficacy and safety of SGLT2 inhibitors in improving HF outcomes. Methods: A systematic search of major electronic databases PubMed, Google Scholar, Semanthic Scholar, Springer, Wiley Online Library was conducted to identify large-scale, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials evaluating SGLT2 inhibitors in patients with HF or those at high risk for HF. Key efficacy outcomes included the composite of cardiovascular (CV) death or hospitalization for heart failure (HHF), its individual components, all-cause mortality, total HHF, renal outcomes, and changes in quality of life. The methodological quality of included trials was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. Results: Sixteen landmark clinical trials and two major meta-analyses were included, encompassing a diverse population of patients with and without type 2 diabetes (T2DM) across the full spectrum of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). The evidence demonstrates a consistent and robust class effect. SGLT2 inhibitors significantly reduce the primary composite outcome of CV death or HHF by approximately 20-25% across all HF phenotypes. This benefit is predominantly driven by a substantial reduction in the risk of first and total HHF, observed in HFrEF (Hazard Ratio ~), HFpEF (HR ~), and in patients with recent worsening HF. A significant reduction in CV death and all-cause mortality was established in patients with HFrEF, with large meta-analyses suggesting a modest mortality benefit across the broader HF population. Furthermore, SGLT2 inhibitors consistently demonstrated profound nephroprotective effects and led to clinically meaningful improvements in patient-reported symptoms and quality of life. The safety profile was generally favorable and consistent across trials. Discussion: The consistent benefits observed across a wide range of patient populations, irrespective of baseline LVEF or diabetes status, have fundamentally altered the HF treatment paradigm. The pleiotropic mechanisms of SGLT2 inhibitors, including hemodynamic, metabolic, and direct myocardial effects, likely contribute to these favorable outcomes. Conclusion: SGLT2 inhibitors have unequivocally been established as a foundational pillar of guideline-directed medical therapy for HF. They significantly reduce the burden of HF hospitalizations, slow the progression of concomitant kidney disease, improve quality of life, and, in HFrEF, reduce mortality.
The Gut-Kidney-Heart Axis in Uremia: A Systematic Review of the Association Between Gut Dysbiosis and Cardiovascular Complications in End-Stage Renal Disease Anggreini Oktavia Trisno; Chelsia Ernes
The International Journal of Medical Science and Health Research Vol. 18 No. 9 (2025): The International Journal of Medical Science and Health Research
Publisher : International Medical Journal Corp. Ltd

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70070/efkwmg60

Abstract

Background: Patients with End-Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) experience an exceptionally high burden of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality that is not fully explained by traditional risk factors. The gut-kidney-heart axis has emerged as a critical pathophysiological paradigm, implicating gut dysbiosis and the resultant accumulation of gut-derived uremic toxins as key non-traditional risk factors for cardiovascular disease (CVD) in this population. Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, Google Scholar, Semantic Scholar, Springer, Wiley Online Library to identify observational studies investigating the association between markers of gut dysbiosis (microbial composition, diversity, and gut-derived metabolites including indoxyl sulfate, p-cresyl sulfate, trimethylamine N-oxide, indole-3-acetic acid [IAA], and phenylacetylglutamine [PAGln]) and cardiovascular complications in adult patients with ESRD. Study selection followed PRISMA guidelines. Data on study design, population characteristics, dysbiosis markers, and cardiovascular outcomes were extracted. The methodological quality of included studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Results: Seventeen primary observational studies, comprising over 4,100 patients, were included. The evidence consistently demonstrated significant associations between gut dysbiosis and adverse cardiovascular outcomes. Lower gut microbial diversity was a strong predictor of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality. Elevated serum levels of IS, PCS, TMAO, IAA, and PAGln were independently associated with increased risks of all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), heart failure, arterial stiffness, and vascular calcification. Furthermore, circulating endotoxin, a marker of intestinal barrier dysfunction, was linked to systemic inflammation, atherosclerosis, and myocardial injury. Discussion: The synthesized evidence supports a mechanistic cascade wherein the uremic milieu of ESRD drives profound gut dysbiosis. This leads to the overproduction of uremic toxins and compromises intestinal barrier integrity, facilitating the systemic translocation of these toxins and other pro-inflammatory bacterial products. These circulating factors subsequently promote cardiovascular pathology through the induction of systemic inflammation, oxidative stress, endothelial dysfunction, and direct cellular toxicity in vascular and myocardial tissues. Conclusion: Gut dysbiosis is significantly and consistently associated with a wide spectrum of adverse cardiovascular outcomes in patients with ESRD. These findings underscore the gut as a central organ in the pathophysiology of uremic cardiovascular disease and highlight the gut-kidney-heart axis as a crucial therapeutic target for mitigating the excessive cardiovascular risk in this vulnerable population.