Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Indonesian State Law Review (ISLRev)
Fadly Ikhsan Pradana
Unknown Affiliation
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

 1 
PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI YANG TIDAK DILAKSANAKAN DALAM PENGUJIAN UNDANG-UNDANG DITINJAU DARI ASAS ERGA OMNES: (Analisis Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 1/PUU-XI/2013) Fadly Ikhsan Pradana; Wicipto Setiadi
Indonesian State Law Review Vol. 3 No. 2 (2021): Indonesian State Law Review, 2021
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/islrev.v3i2.22998

Abstract

The Indonesian Constitutional Court was formed based on the Amendment to the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia.. The Constitutional Court in giving decisions must be implemented and obeyed in general (erge omnes). However, there are still state officials who do not implement the Constitutional Court decisions. Based on the 2019 academic report issued by the Faculty of Law, Trisakti University, 22 percent did not carry out the decisions ordered by the Constitutional Court. The research method used by the author is normative juridical using library materials. There is a Constitutional Court Ruling that cannot be implemented, namely the imposition of Article 335 of the Criminal Code with an unpleasant phrase. Based on this, the provision has no binding law. The factor of the inability to implement the Constitutional Court decision is that there is no executing institution and support from political parties. It can be summarized that there is a need for an executor and given a clear time statement.
Co-Authors