Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Analisis kritis sistem evaluasi pendidikan Indonesia Al Fajri, Taufiq Akbar; Novita, Evi Diyah; Dayana, Dayana; Rahayu, Anisa Agustina; Ramadhani, Aliffiah Elsa Fitri; Sembiring, Royhan Febriyanta; Kadir, Abdul
Ma'arif Journal of Education, Madrasah Innovation and Aswaja Studies Vol 1 No 1 (2022): JUNE
Publisher : Lembaga Pendidikan Ma'arif Nahdlatul Ulama, Kabupaten Malang, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.69966/mjemias.v1i1.1

Abstract

This study aims to evaluate the Indonesian national education system that has existed Indonesia for decades. The assessment method used is a comparison with the national basis, the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia (UUD RI 1945), and is aimed at Indonesia's national law on education systems and practices. The research method used is a literature study. The results of the study indicate that in an effort to advance the quality of students, a strategic, structured procedure system is needed in planning, organizing, evaluating processes, and making continuous improvements to the education system in Indonesia. One of the results of the evaluation of the education system is the change in the evaluation of student assessment from the National Examination (UN) to the Minimum Competency Assessment (Asessmen Kompetensi Minimum). This proves that the National Examination has not been fully effective in assessing the quality of students, so this Minimum Competency Assessment is an effective substitute because it measures the competence of reasoning used in solving problems in various contexts of teacher certification in improving teacher quality.
Bridging Policy and Practice: An Analysis of Outcome-Based Education (OBE) Curriculum Implementation Using David C. Korten’s Fit Model Wike; Novita, Evi Diyah; Haryono, Bambang Santoso
Jurnal Kependidikan : Jurnal Hasil Penelitian dan Kajian Kepustakaan di Bidang Pendidikan, Pengajaran, dan Pembelajaran Vol. 12 No. 1 (2026): March
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Pendidikan Mandalika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33394/jk.v12i1.19879

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the implementation of the Outcome-Based Education (OBE) curriculum at a faculty in a state-owned university in East Java using David C. Korten’s fit model, which emphasizes three elements: program, organization, and beneficiary alignment. This research employs a qualitative descriptive approach. Data were collected through in-depth interviews with 12 lecturers, 6 students, and 3 administrative staff members, as well as through observations and documentation studies. The data were analyzed using the interactive analysis model. The results indicate that the implementation of OBE has achieved a progressive alignment between program design, organizational capacity, and beneficiaries, although it remains in a consolidation phase. The adoption of the Case Method and Project-Based Learning, supported by the SIM OBE information system, has successfully shifted the academic culture toward a student-centered learning approach, with average learning outcome achievements exceeding 70 percent of the class average score. The discussion of the findings suggests that while structural support and stakeholder involvement are relatively strong, several challenges remain, particularly regarding the consistency of pedagogical practices and the standardization of assessment among faculty members. These dynamics indicate that successful curriculum transformation requires a “triple alignment” among policy regulations, organizational culture, and classroom-level implementation. This study contributes to the conceptual framework of educational policy implementation by emphasizing that academic transformation is not merely administrative but requires strong synergy between curriculum design and operational capacity. The findings provide strategic insights for higher education institutions to optimize OBE implementation through the systematic integration of digital systems, faculty mentoring, and stakeholder collaboration to enhance graduate competitiveness.