Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Supremasi Hukum
Petrus Tamu Tuya
Unknown Affiliation
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

 1 
ANALISIS DAN PRESKRIPSI YURIDIS ATAS PUTUSAN HAKIM TERHADAP TINDAK PIDANA PENIPUAN Nurdin, Fransiskus Saverius; Petrus Tamu Tuya
SUPREMASI HUKUM Vol. 20 No. 01 (2024): Supremasi Hukum
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Syekh Yusuf

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33592/sh.v20i01.3368

Abstract

This study aims to question, analyze, and finally provide a juridical prescription of the Decision of the Panel of Judges of the Waingapu District Court Number: 48/Pid.B/2018/PN. Wgp, in trying a case of criminal fraud committed by the Amanda Permata Waingapu Cooperative management. Based on the research results, the panel of judges' decision stated that the defendants were proven guilty of committing the crime of "continuous fraud" as stipulated and threatened in Article 378 of the Criminal Code in conjunction with Article 55 Paragraph (1) 1st of the Criminal Code in conjunction with Article 64 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Code with imprisonment for each -one year and five months each. This research is a normative juridical research with a statutory, conceptual approach and Case approach. This study concludes that the decision is far from the true legal purpose because it is not appropriate and does not consider the victim's loss. The verdict favored the defendants with light sentences and freed them from all claims for damages. The A quo case should have been a civil case. Keywords: Waingapu District Court, KSU Amanda, Victims, Prescription
Co-Authors Fransiskus Saverius Nurdin, Fransiskus Saverius