Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu Pendidikan Indonesia
Hidayat , Hafiz
Unknown Affiliation
Humanities Education Mathematics Social Sciences Other

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

 1 
Menganalisis Pemilihan Model Evaluasi Program Pendidikan Widiastuti, Widiastuti; Linora, Linora; Hidayat , Hafiz
Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu Pendidikan Indonesia Vol. 3 No. 3 (2024): Volume 3 No 3
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat, Universitas Pahlawan Tuanku Tambusai

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31004/jpion.v3i3.299

Abstract

The aim of this research is to analyze the selection of educational program evaluation models. This research uses a qualitative approach. The research results show that the Scriven Model Scriven designed two evaluation models, namely: (1) Goal-Free Evaluation Approach, and (b) Formative and Summative model, 2) Contenance Evaluation Model (Stake Model). The program evaluation model introduced by Stake is known as the Countenance (overall) model. 3) Alkin Model. Limitations of the evaluation construct as a process of determining the area to be evaluated. 4) CSE-UCLA Evaluation Model. The steps of the CSE-UCLA model are divided into four stages, namely: needs assessment, program planning, formative evaluation, and summative evaluation. 5) Discrepancy Model. The steps in this gap model are: preparation of design, installation, process, d) Measuring the goal (product), e) comparison (program comparison), 6) Brinkerhoff et-al's model consists of: (1) fixed vs emergent evaluation design, (2) formative vs summative evaluation, and (3) experimental and quasi experimental design vs natural/unobtrusive inquiry.
Co-Authors Linora, Linora WIDIASTUTI -