Marbujang
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

JATUHNYA THALAQ PERSFEKTIF IMAM SYAFI’I DAN IMAM MALIKI Marbujang
Jurnal Al-Wasith : Jurnal Studi Hukum Islam Vol. 10 No. 2 (2025): Jurnal Al-Wasith: Jurnal Studi Hukum Islam
Publisher : Universitas Nahdlatul Ulama Al Ghazali Cilacap

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52802/wst.v10i2.1833

Abstract

This research seeks to explore of thalaq within the Syafi‘i and Maliki schools through a comparative lens, aiming to uncover their shared principles, methodological differences, and contemporary relevance for family law reform. The results indicate that both the Syafi‘i and Maliki traditions are grounded in the same foundational legal authorities—the Qur’an, the Sunnah, and ijma‘ and exhibit parallel structures in their classification of thalaq as well as in their treatment of iddah and ruju‘. However, clear divergences arise in their methodological frameworks. The Syafi‘i school maintains a predominantly textual and literal orientation, while the Maliki school places greater emphasis on contextual considerations through the use of ‘amal ahl al-Madinah and the principle of maslahah mursalah. These contrasting approaches produce differing legal assessments concerning divorce pronounced in anger, the validity of triple thalaq, and the extent to which intention determines the legal consequences of a divorce pronouncement.
REKONSTRUKSI HUKUM KELUARGA ISLAM MELALUI INTEGRITAS MAQASID AL-SYAR’IAH DAN PRINSIP HAM DI INDONESIA Hendrianto; Marbujang; Herliansyah, Putrado; Anro Foza, Yerry; Suyatna, Enang
Jurnal Al-Wasith : Jurnal Studi Hukum Islam Vol. 10 No. 2 (2025): Jurnal Al-Wasith: Jurnal Studi Hukum Islam
Publisher : Universitas Nahdlatul Ulama Al Ghazali Cilacap

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52802/wst.v10i2.1838

Abstract

This research explores the potential integration of maqāṣid al-sharī‘ah with human rights principles (HAM) as a conceptual basis for advancing the modernization of Islamic family law in Indonesia. Through a qualitative–descriptive method grounded in library-based investigation, the study examines a range of primary references such as the Qur’an, Hadith, the Compilation of Islamic Law (KHI). The results indicate that maqāṣid al-sharī‘ah align closely with the core values upheld by human rights, especially concerning justice, the preservation of human dignity, and the promotion of societal welfare Moreover. In conclusion, the study provides a meaningful contribution by outlining a theoretical and practical model for reforming Islamic family law into a system that is more human-oriented, inclusive, and responsive to human rights concerns. At the same time, it enhances the relevance and standing of Islamic law within Indonesia’s national legal structure.
Solusi Syar’i Terhadap Hubungan Mahram pada Keluarga Adopsi: Sharī‘ah Oriented Legal Approaches to Regulating Mahram Relations within Adoptive Families Marbujang; Syahrial Dedi; Rifanto Bin Ridwan
BUSTANUL FUQAHA: Jurnal Bidang Hukum Islam Vol. 7 No. 1 (2026): BUSTANUL FUQAHA: Jurnal Bidang Hukum Islam
Publisher : Pusat Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat (P3M), Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Islam dan Bahasa Arab (STIBA) Makassar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36701/bustanul.v7i1.2969

Abstract

The question of mahram status in adoptive families constitutes a substantive normative challenge within Islamic family law, particularly when adoption is not supported by a Sharī‘ah-recognized mechanism capable of creating legally valid kinship ties. Although adoptive relationships frequently cultivate deep emotional attachment and social cohesion, such bonds do not, in themselves, establish mahram status. This distinction necessitates careful legal examination. This research therefore analyzes the doctrinal framework regulating mahram relations in adoptive contexts and formulates sharī‘ah-based responses suited to contemporary muslim societies. Using a normative legal research model, the study combines conceptual, comparative, and ushul fiqh approaches. Its primary sources consist of the Qur’an, hadith, classical fiqh literature, and recent scholarly publications. The analysis employs content analysis, comparative assessment of juristic opinions, and reasoning grounded in maqāṣid al-syarī‘ah. The findings affirm that mahram status arises solely through nasab, muṣāharah, or raḍā‘ah that fulfills established legal requirements. Moreover, juristic disagreement concerning the age limit of raḍā‘ah significantly shapes modern legal interpretations of adoption. Accordingly, the study advances a tiered sharī‘ah based framework prioritizing early childhood raḍā‘ah and contextual ijtihād grounded in maṣlaḥah and legal prudence.