Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurist-Diction Qawanin Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Adinda Maura Salwa
Unknown Affiliation
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Indonesia's Struggle Against Cyber ​​Grooming: Reformulating Criminal Law in the Era of Online Prostitution Through Comparative Insights from Malaysia, Singapore, Canada, and Australia Adinda Maura Salwa; Benny Sumardiana
Qawanin Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 6 No. 2 (2025): September 2025 - February 2026
Publisher : Program Studi Ilmu Hukum, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Muslim Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56087/qawaninjih.v6i2.968

Abstract

In essence, children can obtain, seek and share information through any media to support their development process. Therefore, the Internet is a platform that children can choose to fulfill their needs. However, the large number of sexual predators roaming social media puts children in a dangerous situation of being exposed to cyber grooming crimes. The methodology chosen in preparing this article is a normative research method that carries out studies by using various related scientific literature. Through this discourse, the fact is obtained that advances in cyber technology have exceeded the regulatory framework in Indonesia, resulting in the slow handling of contemporary forms of crime such as cyber grooming. Therefore, legal policy reform is needed to provide legal certainty in following up on cyber grooming crimes.
The Future of Indonesian Asset Confiscation Through the Unexplained Wealth Order (UWO) Mechanism: A Comparative Study with the UK Adinda Maura Salwa
Jurist-Diction Vol. 9 No. 1 (2026): Volume 9 No. 1, Januari 2026
Publisher : Universitas Airlangga

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20473/jd.v9i1.71880

Abstract

This study conducts a normative legal analysis using a comparative approach to examine the asset confiscation laws in Indonesia and the UK. The main objective of the study is to evaluate the effectiveness and efficiency of the asset recovery mechanisms aimed at addressing state losses due to corruption. In the UK, the implementation of the Unexplained Wealth Order (UWO) has successfully navigated various legal and institutional challenges in the asset recovery process. In contrast, Indonesia continues to face obstacles due to its reliance on a conventional approach that necessitates criminal penalties before asset confiscation can occur. This study utilizes primary legal materials, such as regulations and jurisprudence, along with secondary legal resources, to identify the differences in procedures and institutions involved in asset confiscation between the two countries. The novelty of this lies in the description of the two-asset confiscation legal systems that, in previous studies often examined separately. The study results recommend that Indonesia should promptly ratify the Asset Confiscation Bill by adopting strategic elements from the UWO mechanism in the UK to enhance its asset recovery efforts.
Co-Authors Benny Sumardiana