Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.61
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Al-Insaf - Jurnal Ahwal Al Syakhshiyyah IPSSJ
Zaki Saiful Alam
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Disparitas Putusan Hakim dalam Penetapan Rujuk Bil Fi’li Pasca Cerai Talak Zaki Saiful Alam
Al-Inṣāf Vol 3 No 2 (2024): Al-Insaf - Jurnal Ahwal Al Syakhshiyyah
Publisher : Prodi Ahwal Al-Syakhsiyyah STAI Imam Syafi'i Cianjur

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61610/ash.v3i2.51

Abstract

This article analyzes the difference in decisions between religious court panels in divorce cases. The Bandung Religious High Court rejected the Bogor Religious Court's divorce verdict, then the Supreme Court rejected the Bandung Religious High Court's verdict. The Bogor Religious Court decided that divorce is the last alternative so that each party does not further violate legal and religious norms. One of the reasons for the Bandung High Court's rejection was the existence of rujuk bil fi'li (rujuk by action), namely intercourse. The applicant reapplied for divorce to the cassation level by bringing evidence so that it was granted by the Supreme Court and gave the applicant permission to impose the pledge of divorce with decision number 394 K/Ag/2015. This article uses a case study approach with descriptive analytical research methods, then analyzes the data using the perspective of Law No. 1 Th. 1974 on marriage, Qawaid Fiqhiyyah and Jeremy Bentham's Utilitarianism theory. This study argues that the Supreme Court's decision is correct, because it is in accordance with Law No. 1 of 1974 concerning marriage, Qawaid Fiqhiyyah and the Compilation of Islamic Law. The Supreme Court used the opinion of the Syafi'iyah school of thought which states that rujuk bil fi'li is not allowed and having intercourse during the 'iddah period is prohibited. KHI has regulated rujuk and does not accommodate the opinion of the fiqh experts who justify rujuk bil fi'li.
Disparitas Putusan Hakim dalam Penetapan Rujuk Bil Fi’li Pasca Cerai Talak Saiful Alam, Zaki
Al-Inṣāf Vol 3 No 2 (2024): Al-Insaf - Jurnal Ahwal Al Syakhshiyyah
Publisher : Prodi Ahwal Al-Syakhsiyyah STAI Imam Syafi'i Cianjur

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61610/ash.v3i2.51

Abstract

This article analyzes the difference in decisions between religious court panels in divorce cases. The Bandung Religious High Court rejected the Bogor Religious Court's divorce verdict, then the Supreme Court rejected the Bandung Religious High Court's verdict. The Bogor Religious Court decided that divorce is the last alternative so that each party does not further violate legal and religious norms. One of the reasons for the Bandung High Court's rejection was the existence of rujuk bil fi'li (rujuk by action), namely intercourse. The applicant reapplied for divorce to the cassation level by bringing evidence so that it was granted by the Supreme Court and gave the applicant permission to impose the pledge of divorce with decision number 394 K/Ag/2015. This article uses a case study approach with descriptive analytical research methods, then analyzes the data using the perspective of Law No. 1 Th. 1974 on marriage, Qawaid Fiqhiyyah and Jeremy Bentham's Utilitarianism theory. This study argues that the Supreme Court's decision is correct, because it is in accordance with Law No. 1 of 1974 concerning marriage, Qawaid Fiqhiyyah and the Compilation of Islamic Law. The Supreme Court used the opinion of the Syafi'iyah school of thought which states that rujuk bil fi'li is not allowed and having intercourse during the 'iddah period is prohibited. KHI has regulated rujuk and does not accommodate the opinion of the fiqh experts who justify rujuk bil fi'li.
DIALEKTIKA MADZHAB SYAFI’I DAN HANBALI DALAM TRADISI KAFA’AH NASAB HABAIB DI INDONESIA Abdul Wahid; Zaki Saiful Alam
Integrative Perspectives of Social and Science Journal Vol. 3 No. 04 April (2026): Integrative Perspectives of Social and Science Journal
Publisher : PT Wahana Global Education

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis dialektika pemikiran hukum Islam dalam praktik kafa’ah nasab pada komunitas Ahlul Bait (Habaib) di Indonesia. Meskipun secara sosiologis komunitas Habaib di Indonesia merupakan penganut Madzhab Syafi’i, dalam urusan perwalian dan pernikahan Syarifah, mereka cenderung mengadopsi rigititas Madzhab Hanbali. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode kualitatif dengan pendekatan normatif-komparatif melalui studi pustaka terhadap literatur fikih klasik dan kontemporer. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa terdapat anomali praktik hukum di mana hak pengguguran kafa’ah tidak hanya berada pada wali terdekat (wali aqrab), melainkan menjadi hak kolektif seluruh wali (wali ab’ad), sebagaimana diderivasi dari pandangan Imam Ahmad bin Hanbal. Penggunaan standar Madzhab Hanbali ini merupakan upaya preventif untuk menjaga kehormatan nasab mulia dan menghindari kemudaratan berupa konflik internal keluarga serta potensi pembatalan pernikahan (faskh). Penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa dialektika antar-madzhab ini merupakan strategi resiliensi identitas Ahlul Bait di tengah realitas sosial Indonesia yang egaliter.
Co-Authors Abdul Wahid