Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Sertipikat Tanah VS Sertifikat Tanah: Analisis Data Penggunaan Istilah Produk Hukum di Media Sosial Ridho Darman
Journal Islamic Global Network for Information Technology and Entrepreneurship Vol. 2 No. 3 (2024): July : Journal Islamic Global Network for Information Technology and Entreprene
Publisher : STIKes Ibnu Sina Ajibarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59841/ignite.v2i3.1758

Abstract

The land title (in Indonesian: sertipikat) is a legal product issued by the Ministry of Agrarian Affairs and Spatial Planning/National Land Agency, while “sertifikat” (spelled with 'f' instead of 'p'), which is the standard term according to KBBI (Indonesian Dictionary). The number of social media users increases every year, resulting in a growing amount of data generated. Big data derived from social media can encompass public perception or societal behaviors. The significant benefits derived from social media analytics provide opportunities to explore and analyze data sources within social media. This study analyzes data from the social media platforms Twitter, Facebook, and Instagram to determine common terms used by the public regarding "sertipikat tanah" (land certificate) and "sertifikat tanah" (land certificate). These platforms were chosen because they provide open data. The use of uncommon terms among the public potentially hinders the government's intended objectives. The final results indicate that despite "sertipikat" being the official legal term, the public is more accustomed to using "sertifikat tanah." The comparison of usage between "sertipikat tanah" and "sertifikat tanah" on Facebook is 11% : 89%, on Instagram 38% : 62%, and on Twitter 70% : 30%, with the majority of "sertipikat tanah" usage on Twitter originating from government accounts.
Analisis Logical Fallacy terhadap Masalah Lingkungan dan Pengelolaan Sumber Daya Alam di Media Sosial Ridho Darman
Mutiara : Jurnal Penelitian dan Karya Ilmiah Vol. 4 No. 3 (2026): Juni : Mutiara : Jurnal Penelitian dan Karya Ilmiah
Publisher : STAI YPIQ BAUBAU, SULAWESI TENGGARA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59059/mutiara.v4i3.3122

Abstract

This study aims to identify and analyze the logical fallacies that arise in public conversations about environmental issues and natural resource management on Indonesian social media using a descriptive qualitative approach. Data were collected through scraping techniques using the Python programming language and subsequently analyzed using an informal logic framework to identify various forms of fallacious reasoning. The findings reveal the presence of multiple fallacies that substantially influence public understanding of causal relationships within environmental dynamics. These fallacies contribute to oversimplification, shifts in attention away from scientific evidence, and the emergence of distorted perceptions regarding structural factors in spatial planning and natural resource governance. This study contributes to environmental communication scholarship by emphasizing the importance of critical thinking literacy in improving the quality of public deliberation and supporting the formulation of evidence-based environmental policies.