Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Perspektif Hukum Terhadap Perilaku Pemukulan Antar Anak Dalam Sudut Pandang Behaviorisme Hasna, Alika Mahira; Abdulgani, Rika Kurniasari
UNES Law Review Vol. 8 No. 1 (2025)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v8i1.2452

Abstract

Perspektif hukum terhadap perilaku pemukulan antar anak dalam sudut pandang behaviorisme merupakan bahasan bagaimana sistem hukum Indonesia menangani kasus pemukulan yang dilakukan oleh anak dengan pendekatan behaviorisme. Objek penelitian adalah anak sebagai pelaku tindak pidana pemukulan. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis prospek pidana terhadap pelaku pemukulan anak, memahami faktor psikologis yang menyebabkan anak melakukan kekerasan berdasarkan teori behaviorisme, serta mengidentifikasi upaya yang dapat dilakukan untuk meninimalisit kekerasan antar anak. Metode yang digunakan merupakan penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan peraturan-undangan dan studi kasus. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa perilaku pemukulan pada anak sangat dipengaruhi oleh lingkungan, pola asuhm dan pengalaman belajar, sehingga sistem peradilan pidana anak di Indonesia lebih mengutamanakan mekanisme diversi, rehabilitasi, dan pelatihan daripada penghukuman. Program konseling, mediasi serta penguatan peran keluarga dan lingkungan sosial terbukti efektif dalam memutuskan rantai perilaku agresif pada anak.
URGENSI PENGESAHAN UNDANG-UNDANG PERAMPASAN ASET TINDAK PIDANA DALAM MENCEGAH DAN MEMBERANTAS TINDAK PIDANA PENCUCIAN UANG Abdulgani, Rika Kurniasari
LITIGASI Vol. 24 No. 1 (2023)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pasundan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23969/litigasi.v24i1.7129

Abstract

A form of crime that often occurs in Indonesia is money laundering. Indonesia is declared as one of the Non-Cooperative Countries and Territories (NCTTs) countries with the threat of sanctions for termination of international banks with Indonesian banks, other countries will reject Letters of Credit (L/C) issued by Indonesian banks and Indonesian financial institutions will be charged high fees in every financial transaction with foreign institutions. Indonesia itself only criminalized money laundering in 2002 with the enactment of Law Number 15 of 2002. The Criminal Asset Forfeiture Bill is carried out by the in rem forfeiture method by asserting that a legal action is taken against the asset, not against the individual (in rem personam) with emphasis on assets allegedly derived or used in criminal acts. Allowing criminal actors to continue to control the proceeds and instruments (assets) of criminal acts will provide opportunities for criminal actors or other parties to enjoy the proceeds of crime and reuse the proceeds of crime for other crimes, so that the Criminal Asset Forfeiture Bill is indispensable in preventing and eradicating Money Laundering. Keywords: Money Laundering, Aset Forfeiture, Follow The Money, Criminal Act.
Rehabilitation of Corruption Convicts: A Modern Sentencing Theory Perspective Gunawan, Ghani Fauzan; Abdulgani, Rika Kurniasari
Ilmu Hukum Prima (IHP) Vol. 9 No. 1 (2026): JURNAL ILMU HUKUM PRIMA
Publisher : jurnal.unprimdn.ac.id

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This study examines the application of rehabilitation for individuals convicted of corruption offenses through the lens of modern sentencing theory, and proposes normative criteria for its implementation within Indonesian positive law. Using a normative juridical method with statutory, conceptual, and case-based approaches, legal materials were analyzed qualitatively. The findings reveal that rehabilitation in Indonesian law rests on a strong constitutional foundation as an attributed power of the President, and has progressively evolved into an instrument for protecting individual rights within the criminal justice system. However, the existing legal framework remains incomplete, as it does not explicitly accommodate rehabilitation for convicts whose sentences carry permanent legal force—particularly in corruption cases that intersect with business decision-making. From a modern sentencing theory perspective, rehabilitation functions as a corrective mechanism to shield individuals from potential state error, provided it does not compromise the public interest in eradicating corruption. Accordingly, five strict normative criteria are proposed for its application: (1) demonstrable error in the criminal conviction, (2) a lawful basis of authority, (3) relevance to the business judgment rule, (4) adherence to the principle of proportionality, and (5) assurance that no impunity is created. Rehabilitation, under these conditions, should be viewed not as a weakening of criminal law, but as an integral corrective mechanism within the rule of law that sustains a balance among legal certainty, justice, and social utility.