Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Analisis Sentimen Publik pada Twitter Terhadap Kasus Defamation Trial Johnny Depp dan Amber Heard Salsabiila, Pravidya; Nafiyanto, Mohamad Irfan
JOM Vol 5 No 1 (2024): Indonesian Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, March 2024
Publisher : Universitas Islam Tribakti Lirboyo Kediri

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33367/ijhass.v5i1.5346

Abstract

Twitter as a virtual public space, provides a place for people to express their perceptions, thoughts, and emotions about certain phenomena that are worthy of discussion in order to generate public sentiment. The case of Johnny Depp suing Amber Heard for domestic violence attracted public attention. The allegation, which was ultimately not proven by the facts of the case after Johnny Depp won the case, generated mixed public reactions on Twitter, which is one of the social media used by the public to share opinions. The research aims to reveal the public sentiment regarding the case of Johnny Depp and Amber Heard in the declaration of victory in the defamation court on Twitter. Based on the influence of patriarchal culture in Indonesia, this public sentiment was generated. This research uses the laxicon method with the VADER sentiment analysis tool to classify the data set obtained by the researchers. The obtained sentiment analysis results were tested for the accuracy of tweet data classification using the confusion table matrix method. Based on the results of sentiment analysis of tweets on Twitter, it was found that the public tended to have high positive sentiment regarding the Johnny Depp case, namely 57% (373 tweets). This was followed by 30% (192 tweets) with negative sentiment and 13% (83 tweets) with neutral sentiment out of a total of 648 tweets. The accuracy value using the confusion matrix calculation was 0.774.
Public Narrative of Flood Causes and Solutions in Surabaya Salsabiila, Pravidya; Nafiyanto, Mohamad Irfan
INFLUENCE: INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENCE REVIEW Vol. 8 No. 1 (2026): INFLUENCE: International Journal of Science Review
Publisher : Global Writing Academica Researching and Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54783/influencejournal.v8i1.302

Abstract

The rainy season has been observed to result in the river reaching its maximum discharge, thereby causing water to be sent into residential areas and roads at approximately 200 points within the Surabaya city area. This phenomenon is further compounded by the inadequacy of the drainage system, which, despite the construction of box culverts in anticipation of the issue, has not yielded substantial results in terms of flood risk management. In confronting these challenges, it is imperative to recognise the pivotal role that community perceptions play in effectively managing and responding to disasters. This study aims to explore the basis of community perceptions regarding mitigation, evacuation, rehabilitation, and the assessment of the city government's flood management strategies in the Surabaya area. The research will implement ethnography virtual research methods by uncovering public narratives generated through comments on “lovesuroboyo” Instagram posts related to flood and culvert box. The discourse in the public sphere has indicated a pervasive sentiment of dissatisfaction with the government for flood risk management. This has led that the culvert box, a primary conduit for flood mitigation, has been adjudged unsatisfactory. In the context of environmental protection and flood management, it is imperative to underscore the significance of two key elements, namely, effective drainage infrastructure and a shared understanding among stakeholders. The necessity for collaboration between government entities and the community as an instrumental means of addressing and mitigating challenges pertaining to flooding.