Saputra, Yuandani
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Hasil Tindakan Bedah Implantasi Glaucoma Drainage Device pada Pasien Glaukoma Refrakter di RSUP dr Sardjito Saputra, Yuandani; Jati, Krisna Dwi Purnomo; Gani, Tatang Talka; Ekantini, Retno
Majalah Oftalmologi Indonesia Vol 49 No S1 (2023): Supplement Edition
Publisher : The Indonesian Ophthalmologists Association (IOA, Perhimpunan Dokter Spesialis Mata Indonesia (Perdami))

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35749/ak6fah94

Abstract

Introduction: Glaucoma drainage device (GDD) implantation was an effective surgical procedure in treating uncontrolled intraocular pressure (IOP) of glaucoma patients in certain complicated conditions. GDD implants were classified into valved and non-valved in which its surgical outcomes in different types of device and various etiologies were not similar. This study aimed to evaluate the surgery outcomes of GDD implantation in patients with refractory glaucoma at Sardjito General Hospital. Methods: All 12 eyes of 11 patient’s medical records who underwent GDD implantation during 2022 at Sardjito General Hospital was reviewed. Baseline data include age, gender, eye laterality, type of glaucoma, IOP and visual acuity. The IOP and visual acuity (LogMAR) were measured at week 1, month 1, 2 and 3. Type of GDD implants, postoperative glaucoma medications, complications and need for further glaucoma surgery were documented. Results: The mean IOP at baseline was 44 ± 14.2 mmHg with 3.4 ± 0.6 glaucoma medications. It decreased after surgery into 19.1 ± 11.2 mmHg (p=0.003) at 3 months follow up with 0.7 ± 1.7 (p=0.002) glaucoma medications. The mean initial visual acuity was 1.9 ± 0.6 and changed insignificantly to 1.7 ± 0.8 (p=0.624) at last follow up. Six eyes (50%) were implanted with valved implant. The most common early postoperative complications were recurrent high IOP (4 eyes, 33.3%) associated to ripcord of non-valved implant (p=0.025). Five eyes (41.7%) needed additional surgery related to non-valved implant type (p=0.003). Conclusion: GDD implantation especially valved type appears to be safe and effective surgical option in treating refractory glaucoma patients Keywords: Glaucoma drainage device, refractory glaucoma, glaucoma surgery, intraocular pressure
Surgery Outcomes of Glaucoma Drainage Device Implantation in Refractory Glaucoma Patients at Sardjito General Hospital: Oral Presentation - Observational Study - Resident Saputra, Yuandani; Jati, Krisna Dwi Purnomo; Ekantini, Retno; Gani, Tatang T
Majalah Oftalmologi Indonesia Vol 49 No S2 (2023): Supplement Edition
Publisher : The Indonesian Ophthalmologists Association (IOA, Perhimpunan Dokter Spesialis Mata Indonesia (Perdami))

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35749/2fz26x42

Abstract

Introduction & ObjectivesGlaucoma drainage device (GDD) implantation was an effective surgical procedure in treatinguncontrolled intraocular pressure (IOP) of glaucoma patients in certain complicated conditions. GDDimplants were classified into valved and non-valved in which its surgical outcomes in different typesof device and various etiologies were not similar. This study aimed to evaluate the surgery outcomesof GDD implantation in patients with refractory glaucoma at Sardjito General Hospital. MethodsAll 12 eyes of 11 patient’s medical records who underwent GDD implantation during 2022 at SardjitoGeneral Hospital was reviewed. Baseline data include age, gender, eye laterality, type of glaucoma,IOP and visual acuity. The IOP and visual acuity (LogMAR) were measured at week 1, month 1, 2and 3. Type of GDD implants, postoperative glaucoma medications, complications and need forfurther glaucoma surgery were documented. ResultsThe mean IOP at baseline was 44 ± 14.2 mmHg with 3.4 ± 0.6 glaucoma medications. It decreasedafter surgery into 19.1 ± 11.2 mmHg (p=0.003) at 3 months follow up with 0.7 ± 1.7 (p=0.002)glaucoma medications. The mean initial visual acuity was 1.9 ± 0.6 and changed insignificantly to1.7 ± 0.8 (p=0.624) at last follow up. Six eyes (50%) were implanted with valved implant. The mostcommon early postoperative complications were recurrent high IOP (4 eyes, 33.3%) associated toripcord of non-valved implant (p=0.025). Five eyes (41.7%) needed additional surgery related tonon-valved implant type (p=0.003). ConclusionGDD implantation especially valved type appears to be safe and effective surgical option in treatingrefractory glaucoma patients.