Wardhana, Arif Kusuma
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

THE CORRELATION BETWEEN RETINAL NERVE FIBRE LAYER THICKNESS, OPTIC NERVE HEAD PARAMETER, AND RELATED RISK FACTOR IN GLAUCOMA PATIENT Wardhana, Arif Kusuma; Ekantini, Retno; Gani, Tatang Talka; Jati, Krisna Dwi Purnomo
Majalah Oftalmologi Indonesia Vol 49 No S1 (2023): Supplement Edition
Publisher : The Indonesian Ophthalmologists Association (IOA, Perhimpunan Dokter Spesialis Mata Indonesia (Perdami))

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35749/mm777q10

Abstract

Introduction and Objective: To investigate the correlation between retinal nerve fibre layer (RNFL) thickness and the past RNFL thickness, related risk factor (gender, age, myopia, intraocular pressure (IOP), blood pressure). And RNFL parameter (symmetricity and four quadrants RNFL thickness) and optic nerve head parameter (rim area and vertical cup disc ratio) Methods: 39 right eyes of both sex and various age underwent examination including IOP measurement, subjective refraction for determining refractive error, and optical coherence tomography (OCT) for RNFL and ONH analysis. The follow up were done after one year. Result: The RNFL symmetricity, superior, nasal, inferior, temporal RNFL thickness showed significance correlation with RNFL thickness (R= 0.487, p= 0.002), (R= 0.915, R= 0.749, R= 0.897, R= 0.702 with p= <0.001), but not showed significance correlation with rim area and vertical cup disc ratio (R= 0.175, p= 0.286) and (R= -0.093, p= 0.574). A significance correlation also showed with increasing age, gender, and systolic blood pressure (R= -0.387, p= 0.015), (R= 0.441, p= 0.005) and (R= -0.418, p= 0.008). But not showed significance correlation with history of past RNFL thickness, refractive error, IOP, and diastolic blood pressure (R= 0.258, p= 0.113), (R= 0.005, p= 0.975), (R= -0.234, p=0.152), and (R= 0.060, p=0.717). Conclusion: RNFL thickness measurements showed significance correlation with RNFL parameter. It is not clear if past RNFL thickness, refractive error and IOP related with RNFL thickness even showed significance correlation with age, gender, and systolic blood pressure. Keywords: Glaucoma, RNFL thickness, optical coherence tomography, optic nerve head
The Correlation between Retinal Nerve Fibre Layer Thickness, Optic Nerve Head Parameter, and Related Risk Factor in Glaucoma Patient: Oral Presentation - Observational Study - Resident Wardhana, Arif Kusuma; Ekantini, Retno; Gani, Tatang Talka; Jati , Krisna Dwi Purnomo
Majalah Oftalmologi Indonesia Vol 49 No S2 (2023): Supplement Edition
Publisher : The Indonesian Ophthalmologists Association (IOA, Perhimpunan Dokter Spesialis Mata Indonesia (Perdami))

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35749/87d2ce77

Abstract

Introduction & ObjectivesTo investigate the correlation between retinal nerve fibre layer (RNFL) thickness and the past RNFLthickness, related risk factor (gender, age, myopia, intraocular pressure (IOP), blood pressure). AndRNFL parameter (symmetricity and four quadrants RNFL thickness) and optic nerve head parameter(rim area and vertical cup disc ratio) Methods39 right eyes of both sex and various age underwent examination including IOP measurement,subjective refraction for determining refractive error, and optical coherence tomography (OCT) forRNFL and ONH analysis. The follow up were done after one year. ResultsThe RNFL symmetricity, superior, nasal, inferior, temporal RNFL thickness showed significancecorrelation with RNFL thickness (R= 0.487, p= 0.002), (R= 0.915, R= 0.749, R= 0.897, R= 0.702with p= <0.001), but not showed significance correlation with rim area and vertical cup disc ratio(R= 0.175, p= 0.286) and (R= -0.093, p= 0.574). A significance correlation also showed withincreasing age, gender, and systolic blood pressure (R= -0.387, p= 0.015), (R= 0.441, p= 0.005) and(R= -0.418, p= 0.008). But not showed significance correlation with history of past RNFL thickness,refractive error, IOP, and diastolic blood pressure (R= 0.258, p= 0.113), (R= 0.005, p= 0.975), (R=-0.234, p=0.152), and (R= 0.060, p=0.717). ConclusionRNFL thickness measurements showed significance correlation with RNFL parameter. It is not clearif past RNFL thickness, refractive error and IOP related with RNFL thickness even showedsignificance correlation with age, gender, and systolic blood pressure.