Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Sains
Winanda, Lutgardis Dianika
Unknown Affiliation
Humanities Astronomy Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Chemistry Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Earth & Planetary Sciences Economics, Econometrics & Finance Energy Environmental Science Immunology & microbiology Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Materials Science & Nanotechnology Neuroscience Physics Social Sciences

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

 1 
Analysis of Abuse of Dominant Position through Secret Agreements by PT. Forisa Nusapersada Winanda, Lutgardis Dianika; Irwan, Raden; Basuki, Rahmad; Warsono, Warsono; Pangaribuan, Zekson
Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Sains Vol. 6 No. 3 (2025): Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Sains
Publisher : CV. Publikasi Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59141/jiss.v6i3.1651

Abstract

The regulation in Law Number 5 Year 1999 on the Prohibition of Monopolistic Practices and Unfair Business Competition broadly addresses prohibited agreements, activities, and dominant positions. This study uses a normative juridical research method with the aim of analyzing the closed agreements made by PT Forisa Nusapersada based on Law No. 5 of 1999, Commission Regulation No. 3 of 2009, and Commission Regulation No. 6 of 2010. The research specifically focuses on the abuse of the dominant position through the "Pop Ice The Real Ice Blender" program, which is alleged to have limited market competition and harmed consumer choice. The findings indicate that PT Forisa Nusapersada’s actions constitute an abuse of its dominant position, as it used its market share of 90.09% to 92.16% to monopolize the market by limiting competitors' ability to sell similar products and forcing retailers to display Pop Ice products exclusively. This violation is supported by the findings in KPPU Decision Number 14/KPPU-L/2015, which continued until the Supreme Court Decision Number: 1106 K/Pdt.Sus-KPPU/2017. The research concludes that such strategies violate the provisions of Article 25 paragraph (1) of Law No. 5 of 1999 by unfairly restricting market access and consumer choice, thus undermining fair competition.
Co-Authors BASUKI RAHMAD Irwan, Raden Pangaribuan, Zekson Warsono Warsono