Muhammad Rizqi Alfarizi Ramadhan
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Reconstructing National Economic Loss in Corruption Crimes Elisabeth Sundari; Hilaire Tegnan; Muhammad Rizqi Alfarizi Ramadhan
Jurnal Justice Dialectical Vol 3 No 2 (2025): Journal of Justice Dialectical
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Adhyaksa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70720/jjd.v3i2.96

Abstract

Although various law enforcement instruments have been implemented, the handling of losses due to corruption still tends to focus on state financial losses, without considering the broader state economic losses that have a far more systemic and long-term impact. This research aims to reconstruct the elements of state economic losses to make them more operational in judicial practice, serving as a basis for fair and comprehensive recovery. The method employed is a normative juridical approach, incorporating statutory, conceptual, and case-based elements. The results of the research indicate that first, the element of state economic losses in criminal acts of corruption has not been implemented effectively due to the lack of a clear normative definition, the absence of standard quantitative parameters, and low application in judicial practice due to legal doubts and weak technical capacity of law enforcement officials. This results in the handling of losses due to corruption continuing to focus on narrow state financial losses while ignoring broader and systemic economic impacts. Second, a legal reconstruction of the element of state economic losses is necessary by strengthening the definition in Article 1 of the Corruption Law, adding characteristics and scope to the article’s explanation, and expanding the concept of confiscation and compensation to include structural losses. In addition, the implementation of alternative recovery mechanisms, such as settlement fines from the investigation stage, is important as a restorative effort that objectively considers the value of economic losses.
Legal Analysis of Ownership Rights to Intangible Movable Property (Digital Assets) From the Perspective of Property Law In Indonesia Kurdi; Muhammad Rizqi Alfarizi Ramadhan; Teuku Ahmad Dadek
Al-Risalah VOLUME 26 NO 1, MAY (2026) (IN PRESS
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Alauddin Makassar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24252/al-risalah.vi.62995

Abstract

The The rapid development of digital assets has posed fundamental challenges to Indonesia's property law system, which is still based on the colonial-era Civil Code (KUHPerdata). This legal system is inadequate to accommodate digital assets, resulting in legal vacuums and regulatory paradoxes. This study aims to analyze the status and regulation of digital asset ownership in Indonesia's property law system and the effectiveness of civil law protection for asset owners in ownership disputes. This research uses a normative approach by analyzing relevant legislation and legal doctrines. The results of the study show that there are legal loopholes and regulatory paradoxes in the regulation of digital asset ownership. The classification of digital assets as “intangible movable property” causes fatal incompatibilities in the process of transferring rights. Legal protection for digital asset owners is also illusory due to procedural paralysis. This study recommends a two-pronged reform, namely redefining the concept of “wealth” in the Draft Civil Code to include digital assets and drafting a lex specialis that regulates the procedural law of evidence and execution of digital assets. Thus, it is hoped that effective legal certainty can be created for digital asset owners in Indonesia.