Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Lex Scientia Law Review JILS (Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies)
Verma, Karishma
Unknown Affiliation
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Digital Deception: The Impact of Deepfakes on Privacy Rights Verma, Karishma
Lex Scientia Law Review Vol. 8 No. 2 (2024): Advancing Justice, Rights, and Governance in a Digital and Decentralized World
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/lslr.v8i2.13749

Abstract

Deepfake technology, which uses advanced artificial intelligence to create synthetic media, poses significant threats to privacy rights. Since its emergence, deepfakes have been used in various malicious ways, raising urgent concerns about their impact on privacy rights. This study investigates the implications of deepfake technology on privacy, with a focus on how it affects individuals and legal frameworks. The research is driven by the need to understand the extent of privacy violations and the adequacy of current laws in addressing these challenges. The article aims to provide a comprehensive analysis of the intersection between deepfake technology and privacy rights. It explores the theoretical implications of deepfakes on privacy, assesses public awareness and concern through empirical research, and evaluates existing legal frameworks in the United States, European Union, and India. A mixed-method approach is used in this article. Doctrinal research involves examining profound impact of deepfake technology on privacy rights and analysing legal frameworks and case law to understand the legal responses to deepfakes. Empirical research includes a survey conducted with diverse respondents in India to gauge public awareness, experiences, and opinions regarding deepfakes and its incursion into privacy rights. The study finds that while some jurisdictions have enacted laws to combat deepfakes, significant gaps remain in protecting privacy rights. Empirical findings reveal varying levels of public awareness and concern, highlighting the need for more robust legal measures and public education. The research underscores the necessity for updated and comprehensive legal frameworks to address the evolving challenges posed by deepfake technology. Recommendations include enhancing legal protections while coming up with technological solutions and increasing public awareness to safeguard privacy in the digital age.
Agrarian Reforms vis-à-vis Constitutionalism in India: A Comparative Analysis with Indonesia Chhachhar, Varun; Niravita, Aprila; Verma, Karishma; Sankrit, Swikar
Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies Vol. 10 No. 2 (2025): Legal Responses to Technological Innovation and Governance Challenges in Indon
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/jils.v10i2.31841

Abstract

This paper presents a comparative study on agrarian reforms in India and Indonesia, focusing on their constitutional foundations, legislative mechanisms, and judicial approaches. Agrarian reform has been central to the socio-economic transformation in both countries, where land ownership and rural livelihoods remain deeply significant. The main problem addressed is how these democracies have constitutionally managed land redistribution while balancing property rights and social justice. The study applies a doctrinal and comparative legal method, examining key constitutional provisions, legislative instruments, and judicial decisions. In India, reforms were initiated post-independence through the abolition of the zamindari system, later reinforced by constitutional amendments and the Ninth Schedule, evolving into broader property rights under Article 300A. Indonesia, by contrast, anchors its land reform agenda in the Basic Agrarian Law of 1960, which derives legitimacy from the 1945 Constitution and the state ideology of Pancasila, promoting social justice and state control over land. Findings suggest that India relies more on judicial interpretation to legitimize reform within its constitutional structure, while Indonesia adopts executive-led reforms grounded in centralized legal authority. The paper concludes that despite different institutional approaches, both nations illustrate how constitutional frameworks can be adapted to facilitate distributive justice through agrarian reform.
Co-Authors Aprila Niravita, Aprila Chhachhar, Varun Sankrit, Swikar