Bingül, Muhammet Bahattin
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Analysis of mandibular third molar impaction classification with different skeletal malocclusions Bingül, Muhammet Bahattin; Oğuz, Fırat; Evren, Ayşegül
Dental Journal (Majalah Kedokteran Gigi) Vol. 56 No. 4 (2023): December
Publisher : Faculty of Dental Medicine, Universitas Airlangga https://fkg.unair.ac.id/en

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20473/j.djmkg.v56.i4.p213-219

Abstract

Background: Since the third molar teeth are the last to erupt in the oral cavity, they can become more impacted than other teeth. Insufficient retromolar space and the eruption direction of the third molars can affect this situation. The condition, distribution, and prevalence of impacted third molars in skeletal Class I, II, and III anomalies are important in treatment predictability. Purpose: The aim of this study is to classify impacted lower third molars in patients with different skeletal malocclusions. Methods: This retrospective study examined panoramic X-ray records of patients treated at Inonu University Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Orthodontics, between 2014 and 2021. In total, 1219 mandibular third molar teeth were considered. Impacted mandibular third molar teeth of individuals with different skeletal structures were grouped according to the Pell and Gregory, Winter, and Archer classifications. Results: In this study, 37.74% of the participants were male, and 62.26% were female; 40.94% of examined teeth were skeletal Class I, 41.84% were Class II, and 17.23% were Class III. It was determined that 91.63% of all examined teeth were impacted, and 8.37% had erupted. According to the Pell and Gregory classification, 21.41% of teeth were Grade (I), 38.06% were Grade (II), and 40.53% were Grade (III). According to the Winter classification, 3.12% of examined teeth were buccal, 6.89% were horizontal, 23.71% were mesioangular, and 66.28% were vertical. According to the Archer classification, 14.44% of examined teeth were in position A, 30.02% were in position B, and 55.54% were in position C. No statistically significant relationship was established between grades and gender (p>0.05). Conclusion: A relationship was ascertained between the impacted positions of mandibular third molars in different skeletal structures.
Are YouTube™ videos a reliable source of information about temporomandibular joint arthrocentesis? Bingül, Muhammet Bahattin; Polat, Mehmet Emrah
Dental Journal (Majalah Kedokteran Gigi) Vol. 59 No. 1 (2026)
Publisher : Faculty of Dental Medicine, Universitas Airlangga https://fkg.unair.ac.id/en

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20473/j.djmkg.v59.i1.p95-101

Abstract

Background: Arthrocentesis is a very common method of joint-space lavage for temporomandibular joint disorders. This study evaluated the content and quality of YouTube™ videos on temporomandibular joint arthrocentesis as a source of information for patients, using a sample of 80 videos. Purpose: The goal of this study was to analyze popular YouTube™ videos associated with temporomandibular joint arthrocentesis and to evaluate their accuracy and quality. Methods: The authors searched for the keywords “temporomandibular joint arthrocentesis” on YouTube™ and filtered the first 80 videos by number of views; the 42 videos that met the inclusion criteria were evaluated. Each video was scored between 0 and 8 and categorized as containing poor, moderate, or excellent content. When evaluating the results, the significance level was set at 5%: p<0.05 for a significant difference and p>0.05 for no significant difference. Results: The quality of 61.9% of the evaluated videos was moderate. Some 38.1% of the videos contained poor information content. Evaluated by target group, videos targeting health professionals were more effective in terms of content than videos targeting only lay people (p=0.005), but there was no difference in the interaction and viewership data. Conclusion: YouTube™ may currently be providing patients with misleading content about arthrocentesis. However, YouTube™ videos may affect patients’ decisions. Videos should therefore be checked before they are posted.