Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.562
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities Jurnal As-Syar’i: Jurnal Bimbingan & Konseling Keluarga
Putri, Rafirstka Madyah
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Humanities Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Paradoks PKPU sebagai Instrumen Perdamaian yang Berujung Kepailitan pada Kasus PT Alamsari Lestari Silalahi, Udin; Yap, Abigail Angeline; Maharani, Aurelia Gisa; Putri, Rafirstka Madyah; Nevada, Valonia
As-Syar i: Jurnal Bimbingan & Konseling Keluarga  Vol. 7 No. 4 (2025): As-Syar’i: Jurnal Bimbingan & Konseling Keluarga
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Nasional Laa Roiba Bogor

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This study examines the legal analysis of the fulfillment of formal and material requirements in the voluntary petition for Suspension of Debt Payment Obligations filed by PT Alamsari Lestari. The research is based on the decision of the Commercial Court at the Central Jakarta District Court Number 137/Pdt.Sus-PKPU/2023/PN Niaga Jkt.Pst and the provisions of Law Number 37 of 2004 concerning Bankruptcy and the Suspension of Debt Payment Obligations. The findings indicate that PT Alamsari Lestari has fulfilled both formal and material requirements for submitting a voluntary petition. Formally, the company obtained approval from the General Meeting of Shareholders (RUPS) and submitted the petition in accordance with procedural rules. Materially, PT Alamsari Lestari was proven to have debts to more than one creditor, with obligations that had fallen due and could be claimed. The court’s consideration in granting the petition serves as a preventive measure to avoid bankruptcy and allows the company to restructure its debts through a legally supervised peace plan. This case reflects how the Suspension of Debt Payment Obligations functions as an instrument to balance the interests of debtors and creditors under Indonesian bankruptcy law.
Analysis of the Elements of Unlawful Acts in Decision Number 34/Pdt.G/2018/PN Bli and the Position of L&B Tax as Evidence Maharani, Aurelia Gisa; Pongsirinding, Fisa Ande; Putri, Rafirstka Madyah
Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities Vol. 6 No. 1 (2025): (JLPH) Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities
Publisher : Dinasti Research

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jlph.v6i1.2636

Abstract

In Indonesia, the concept functions to protect the rights of individuals and groups who are harmed by the actions of others. Based on Article 1365 of the Indonesian Civil Code, any unlawful act that causes harm to another party gives rise to the obligation of the perpetrator to compensate for the damage caused. This study examines the application of tort elements in Decision Number 34/Pdt.G/2018/PN Bli, which involved an inheritance land dispute between the plaintiffs and the defendants, with the Head of the Bangli Land Office also joined as a co-defendant. The plaintiffs argued that the disputed land constituted a legitimate inheritance, but they were only able to support their claim through the Land and Building Tax Assessment Notice. Conversely, the defendants succeeded in proving ownership by presenting a Land Ownership Certificate that was procedurally issued by the National Land Agency. In its ruling, the panel of judges rejected the plaintiffs’ main claim and granted the defendants’ counterclaim, declaring that the plaintiffs had committed an unlawful act by occupying the land without a valid legal basis. This judgment emphasizes that the Land and Building Tax Assessment Notice does not have legal force as proof of land ownership, serving merely as an administrative taxation document, whereas the Land Ownership Certificate constitutes valid and strong evidence of ownership in accordance with Article 32 paragraph 1 of Government Regulation No. 24 of 1997 concerning Land Registration. This study highlights the importance of distinguishing between administrative evidence and juridical evidence in land disputes.
Analysis of the Elements of Unlawful Acts in Decision Number 34/Pdt.G/2018/PN Bli and the Position of L&B Tax as Evidence Maharani, Aurelia Gisa; Pongsirinding, Fisa Ande; Putri, Rafirstka Madyah
Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities Vol. 6 No. 1 (2025): (JLPH) Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities
Publisher : Dinasti Research

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jlph.v6i1.2636

Abstract

In Indonesia, the concept functions to protect the rights of individuals and groups who are harmed by the actions of others. Based on Article 1365 of the Indonesian Civil Code, any unlawful act that causes harm to another party gives rise to the obligation of the perpetrator to compensate for the damage caused. This study examines the application of tort elements in Decision Number 34/Pdt.G/2018/PN Bli, which involved an inheritance land dispute between the plaintiffs and the defendants, with the Head of the Bangli Land Office also joined as a co-defendant. The plaintiffs argued that the disputed land constituted a legitimate inheritance, but they were only able to support their claim through the Land and Building Tax Assessment Notice. Conversely, the defendants succeeded in proving ownership by presenting a Land Ownership Certificate that was procedurally issued by the National Land Agency. In its ruling, the panel of judges rejected the plaintiffs’ main claim and granted the defendants’ counterclaim, declaring that the plaintiffs had committed an unlawful act by occupying the land without a valid legal basis. This judgment emphasizes that the Land and Building Tax Assessment Notice does not have legal force as proof of land ownership, serving merely as an administrative taxation document, whereas the Land Ownership Certificate constitutes valid and strong evidence of ownership in accordance with Article 32 paragraph 1 of Government Regulation No. 24 of 1997 concerning Land Registration. This study highlights the importance of distinguishing between administrative evidence and juridical evidence in land disputes.
Co-Authors Jur. M. Udin Silalahi Maharani, Aurelia Gisa Nevada, Valonia Pongsirinding, Fisa Ande Yap, Abigail Angeline