Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.562
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat dan Riset Pendidikan Jurnal Pustaka Cendekia Hukum dan Ilmu Sosial
Gladwin Wijaya
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Arts Humanities Computer Science & IT Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Mathematics Other

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Optimalisasi Pemanfaatan Pajak dalam Perspektif Hukum Keuangan Negara: Antara Prinsip Keadilan Fiskal dan Akuntabilitas Publik Wilma Silalahi; Gladwin Wijaya
Jurnal Pustaka Cendekia Hukum dan Ilmu Sosial Vol. 3 No. 3 (2025): Vol. 3 No. 3 (2025): Jurnal Pustaka Cendekia Hukum dan Ilmu Sosial Volume 3 Nom
Publisher : PT PUSTAKA CENDEKIA GROUP

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70292/pchukumsosial.v3i3.165

Abstract

Taxation is a fundamental instrument in the state financial system, serving as the primary source of revenue to fund governance and national development. This article discusses two key aspects: the legal framework for tax utilization under Law Number 17 of 2003 on State Finance and Law Number 7 of 2021 on the Harmonization of Tax Regulations, as well as the application of the principles of justice and accountability as mandated by Articles 23A and 23C of the 1945 Constitution. The study finds that both laws strengthen the legal and constitutional foundations for transparent, efficient, and equitable tax management. Tax utilization should aim to enhance public welfare through fiscal redistribution, public service funding, and social protection. The principle of justice emphasizes proportional contribution according to economic capacity, while accountability demands transparency and responsibility in every use of public funds. By implementing these principles, taxation becomes not only a fiscal tool but also a legal and moral instrument to promote clean governance, social justice, and sustainable welfare for the people.
Keadilan dan Kepastian Hukum dalam Sistem Perpajakan Indonesia: Penelitian Gladwin Wijaya; Urbanisasi
Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat dan Riset Pendidikan Vol. 4 No. 2 (2025): Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat dan Riset Pendidikan Volume 4 Nomor 2 (October 202
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31004/jerkin.v4i2.3747

Abstract

This study examines two fundamental principles within Indonesia’s taxation system: justice and legal certainty, both of which serve as essential foundations for legitimizing tax collection as a state revenue instrument. Tax justice is explored from philosophical, constitutional, and normative perspectives, particularly based on Article 23A of the 1945 Constitution, the General Tax Provisions and Procedures Law (KUP), the Income Tax Law (PPh), and the Value Added Tax Law (PPN). The findings indicate that tax justice extends beyond tax rates and structures; it includes balancing the rights and obligations of taxpayers, applying progressive tax rates, ensuring non-discriminatory auditing, and providing objective dispute-resolution mechanisms. Legal certainty in taxation is analyzed through tax collection, auditing procedures, and law enforcement mechanisms.
Analisis Judicial Review oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia Terhadap Sistem Pemilu Serentak dalam Undang-Undang Pemilu (Studi atas Putusan MK Nomor 135/PUU-XXII/2024) Wilma Silalahi; Gladwin Wijaya
Jurnal Pustaka Cendekia Hukum dan Ilmu Sosial Vol. 3 No. 3 (2025): Vol. 3 No. 3 (2025): Jurnal Pustaka Cendekia Hukum dan Ilmu Sosial Volume 3 Nom
Publisher : PT PUSTAKA CENDEKIA GROUP

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70292/pchukumsosial.v3i3.243

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis batas kewenangan Mahkamah Konstitusi sebagai negative legislator serta implikasi konstitusional Putusan Nomor 135/PUU-XXII/2024 terhadap prinsip pemilu lima tahunan dan sistem demokrasi di Indonesia. Secara normatif, kewenangan Mahkamah Konstitusi diatur dalam Pasal 24C ayat (1) UUD 1945 yang menegaskan fungsi pengujian undang-undang terhadap konstitusi. Namun, dalam putusan a quo, Mahkamah tidak hanya membatalkan norma pemilu serentak, tetapi juga menetapkan desain baru berupa pemisahan pemilu nasional dan daerah dengan jeda waktu tertentu. Hal ini memunculkan perdebatan karena dinilai melampaui fungsi sebagai negative legislator dan memasuki ranah positive legislator yang menjadi kewenangan legislatif. Selain itu, putusan tersebut berdampak pada prinsip pemilu lima tahunan sebagaimana diatur dalam Pasal 22E UUD 1945, karena berpotensi mengubah siklus pemilu menjadi lebih panjang dan menimbulkan ketidakpastian hukum. Implikasi lainnya mencakup potensi kekosongan hukum, ketidaksinkronan masa jabatan pejabat publik, serta meningkatnya kompleksitas teknis penyelenggaraan pemilu.
Co-Authors Urbanisasi Wilma Silalahi