Krismeikesari Krismeikesari
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Individual SGLT2 Inhibitors (Dapagliflozin, Empagliflozin, and Canagliflozin) on Kidney Function Decline in CKD: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis Krismeikesari Krismeikesari
Open Access Indonesian Journal of Medical Reviews Vol. 5 No. 6 (2025): Open Access Indonesian Journal of Medical Reviews
Publisher : HM Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37275/oaijmr.v5i6.818

Abstract

Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors are a cornerstone therapy for chronic kidney disease (CKD). However, direct head-to-head randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing individual agents are absent. We aimed to compare the relative efficacy and safety of dapagliflozin, empagliflozin, and canagliflozin on kidney function decline in CKD patients. We conducted a PRISMA-NMA compliant systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA). MEDLINE, Embase, and CENTRAL were searched for Phase 3 RCTs with more than 1000 participants comparing dapagliflozin, empagliflozin, or canagliflozin with placebo in adults with CKD. The primary efficacy outcome was a composite of sustained greater than or equal to 50 percent estimated GFR (eGFR) decline, end-stage kidney disease (ESKD), or renal/cardiovascular (CV) death. Nine landmark RCTs (DAPA-CKD, EMPA-KIDNEY, CREDENCE, DECLARE-TIMI 58, EMPA-REG OUTCOME, CANVAS, DAPA-HF, EMPEROR-Pooled, and DELIVER) enrolling a total of 89,452 patients were included. All agents were significantly superior to placebo. The NMA found no statistically significant evidence of superiority for any agent over another for the primary outcome: dapagliflozin vs. empagliflozin (Hazard Ratio [HR] 0.92; 95% Credible Interval [CrI] 0.81-1.06), dapagliflozin vs. canagliflozin (HR 0.94; 95% CrI 0.82-1.09), and empagliflozin vs. canagliflozin (HR 1.02; 95% CrI 0.89-1.17). These findings were robust across multiple sensitivity analyses and consistent for secondary renal and key safety outcomes, including acute kidney injury (AKI) and diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA). This comprehensive NMA found no statistically significant differences in the renoprotective efficacy or safety of dapagliflozin, empagliflozin, and canagliflozin. The findings are consistent with a potent class effect, but do not establish formal equivalence. This suggests the choice among these three agents can be guided by patient-specific co-morbidities, cost, and formulary availability rather than an assumed difference in relative kidney efficacy.
Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Finerenone, Eplerenone, and Spironolactone on Cardiorenal Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes with Chronic Kidney Disease: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis Krismeikesari Krismeikesari
Open Access Indonesian Journal of Medical Reviews Vol. 6 No. 1 (2025): Open Access Indonesian Journal of Medical Reviews
Publisher : HM Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37275/oaijmr.v6i1.819

Abstract

Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) are critical for managing chronic kidney disease (CKD) in type 2 diabetes (T2D), yet a "residual risk" of cardiorenal progression persists. The comparative efficacy and safety of the novel non-steroidal MRA, finerenone, versus the traditional steroidal MRAs, spironolactone and eplerenone, have not been established in a comprehensive analysis. We conducted a network meta-analysis (NMA) to create an evidence-based hierarchy for these three agents. We performed a systematic review searching MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL through March 2025 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in patients with CKD and albuminuria (predominantly T2D) on baseline renin-angiotensin system (RAS) blockade. We compared finerenone, spironolactone, eplerenone, and placebo. The primary efficacy outcome was the percent change in urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR). The primary safety outcome was the relative risk (RR) of hyperkalemia (serum potassium ³ 5.5 mmol/L). A Bayesian random-effects NMA was performed. Seven RCTs involving 15,749 patients were included. For UACR reduction, all MRAs were superior to placebo. Spironolactone (Surface Under the Cumulative Ranking [SUCRA]: 91.2%) and finerenone (SUCRA: 88.5%) were the most effective agents and were statistically indistinguishable. Both were significantly more potent than eplerenone (SUCRA: 58.1%). For hyperkalemia risk, spironolactone was definitively the least safe (SUCRA: 9.5%). Finerenone (RR vs. Spironolactone: 0.63; 95% Credible Interval [CrI]: 0.48–0.82) and eplerenone (RR vs. Spironolactone: 0.65; 95% CrI: 0.45–0.94) were significantly safer. The safety profiles of finerenone (SUCRA: 65.4%) and eplerenone (SUCRA: 62.1%) were comparable.In conclusion, finerenone and spironolactone demonstrate equivalent, superior anti-albuminuric efficacy. However, finerenone uniquely dissociates this high potency from the significant risk of hyperkalemia, offering a safety profile comparable to the less-potent eplerenone. Finerenone, therefore, represents an optimized therapeutic choice, balancing maximal renoprotective efficacy with a superior safety profile for patients with T2D and CKD.