Wirayudha, Dimas Putra
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Transforming Sharia Economic Dispute Resolution through E-Court for Simple, Fast, and Affordable Justice Asyiqin, Istianah Zainal; Fitriyanti, Fadia; Susila, M. Endriyo; Akbar, M. Fabian; Wirayudha, Dimas Putra
Prophetic Law Review Vol. 7 No. 2 December 2025
Publisher : Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20885/PLR.vol7.iss2.art1

Abstract

This study critically examines the implementation of the electronic court (e-Court) system in resolving Sharia economic disputes within Indonesia’s Religious Courts, focusing on selected jurisdictions in Jakarta, Yogyakarta, Central Java, and East Java. Introduced through Supreme Court Regulations No. 1 of 2019 and No. 7 of 2022, the e-Court system aims to modernize judicial processes and realize justice that is simple, fast, and affordable. Using a qualitative descriptive approach, the research draws on data from eight Religious Courts: East Jakarta, South Jakarta, Sleman, Wonosari, Sidoarjo, Surabaya, Pemalang, and Slawi, through interviews, observation, and document analysis. Findings show that while the e-Court system enhances administrative efficiency and transparency, its implementation remains uneven. Urban courts such as Jakarta and Surabaya demonstrate successful digital integration, whereas Wonosari, Pemalang, and Slawi face obstacles in infrastructure, internet access, and digital literacy. These disparities create hybrid practices and raise concerns about procedural validity and data security. From a prophetic law perspective, the e-Court reform embodies the moral ideals of humanization (amar ma’ruf), liberation (nahi munkar), and transcendence (tu’minuna billah). However, unequal access to digital justice contradicts these prophetic values. The study concludes that achieving ethical and inclusive digital transformation requires embedding prophetic legal principles into judicial policy to ensure that modernization serves humanity and justice, not merely administrative efficiency.
Indonesia’s Trade Sovereignty and the U.S. Poison Pill Clause in International Law Gunawan, Yordan; Wirayudha, Dimas Putra; Akbar, M. Fabian; Khaer, Fawaz Muhammad
Jambe Law Journal Vol. 8 No. 2 (2025)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Jambi University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22437/72dqyc81

Abstract

This article examines how the United States' poison pill clause will effect Indonesia's ability to establish trade deals in the future. The primary inquiry is whether the language, initially incorporated into USMCA Article 32.10, aligns with Indonesia's rights and obligations under international economic law. The article contends that poison pill clauses, ostensibly designed as trade limitations, operate as constraining treaty mechanisms that could impair a state's ability to establish agreements with third nations. This research employs a doctrinal legal methodology based on normative analysis, utilizing treaty interpretation and comparative legal frameworks in accordance with the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties and pertinent WTO principles. This includes checking for any concerns with Indonesia's regional commitments and the possibility that they will make it harder to trade over time. The main point is that poison pill clauses make it hard for countries to respect the rules of treaty freedom, sovereign equality, and consistency in the international trading system. There are significant legal grounds for Indonesia not to make such harsh requirements in future trade agreements. Other countries that are becoming more powerful or are already powerful and have complicated treaty responsibilities may likewise have comparable concerns.