Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.562
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Alinea: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, dan Pengajaran LoroNG
Qalbi, Nur Latifatul
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Social Sciences Other

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Framing Of CNN International’s Narrative on the 2025 Gaza Ceasefire through Entman’s Theory Syarif Hidayatullah, Muhammad; Nur, Muhammad; Qalbi, Nur Latifatul
Alinea: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra dan Pengajaran Vol. 5 No. 3 (2025): Alinea: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, dan Pengajaran
Publisher : Bale Literasi: Lembaga Riset, Pelatihan & Edukasi, Sosial, Publikasi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58218/alinea.v5i3.1925

Abstract

International media have extensively covered the ceasefire agreement reached between Hamas and Israel in October 2025, a critical juncture marked by both hope and profound uncertainty. This study examines how CNN International framed this agreement and the underlying context of the prolonged conflict. Using Robert Entman’s framing theory (Problem Definition, Causal Diagnosis, Moral Judgment, and Suggested Remedies) and a qualitative descriptive methodology, we analyze a news report and an analysis piece from CNN International on this topic. Data were collected through systematic reading and annotation, then analyzed using a thematic model aligned with Entman’s framework. The study reveals that CNN International consistently employed a narrative frame of “Celebration and Trepidation.” The media defined the core problem as the precarity of the truce and the high risk of failure due to structural uncertainties (disarmament, governance). The cause of the current success was attributed to US-led diplomacy, while the cause of the uncertainty was rooted in historical failures and the complexity of the political endgame. The media made a moral judgment through strategic empathy, balancing the joy of Israeli hostage families with the mass casualties in Gaza, and proposed solutions centered on logistical control and sustained US leadership for the transition and reconstruction phases. The implication of these findings for language studies is that discourse linguistics and critical discourse analysis (CDA) are effective tools for uncovering the strategic construction of balance and the subtle ideological biases in news texts. By analyzing narrative structure and contrasting emotional language, we demonstrate how language not only reports political realities but also shapes public perceptions of risk and governance in post-conflict scenarios.
Variasi Bahasa Sosiolek dalam Film "Vina Sebelum 7 Hari" Qalbi, Nur Latifatul
LoroNG: Media Pengkajian Sosial Budaya Vol 14 No 2 (2025)
Publisher : Lembaga Kajian, Penelitian dan Pengembangan Mahasiswa Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18860/lorong.v14i2.19812

Abstract

Social and environmental diversity, as well as language use, can be observed not only through direct observation in society but also through works that replicate it. One such work that often portrays the realities of social life is film. “Vina Sebelum 7 Hari” is one of the films that has recently gone viral in Indonesia. This study analyzes the use of sociolect language variations in the dialogues of the film “Vina Sebelum 7 Hari.” The aim of this research is to identify and evaluate the various forms of sociolect used in the film and to understand how these language variations reflect the characters’ social status, educational level, and situational context. A qualitative method with a descriptive approach was employed in this research, using data collection techniques of non-participant observation and interactive data analysis. The findings reveal that in the dialogues of “Vina Sebelum 7 Hari,” all forms of sociolect variations are used, including acrolect, basilect, vulgar, slang, colloquial, jargon, argot, and ken. The use of these language variations not only reflects the diversity of characters and their social backgrounds but also plays an important role in creating the atmosphere and reinforcing the film’s narrative. The use of language appropriate to the context and characters helps the audience to understand the relationships among the characters and the conflicts that unfold in the film.
Framing Of CNN International’s Narrative on the 2025 Gaza Ceasefire through Entman’s Theory Syarif Hidayatullah, Muhammad; Nur, Muhammad; Qalbi, Nur Latifatul
Alinea: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra dan Pengajaran Vol. 5 No. 3 (2025): Alinea: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, dan Pengajaran
Publisher : Bale Literasi: Lembaga Riset, Pelatihan & Edukasi, Sosial, Publikasi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58218/alinea.v5i3.1925

Abstract

International media have extensively covered the ceasefire agreement reached between Hamas and Israel in October 2025, a critical juncture marked by both hope and profound uncertainty. This study examines how CNN International framed this agreement and the underlying context of the prolonged conflict. Using Robert Entman’s framing theory (Problem Definition, Causal Diagnosis, Moral Judgment, and Suggested Remedies) and a qualitative descriptive methodology, we analyze a news report and an analysis piece from CNN International on this topic. Data were collected through systematic reading and annotation, then analyzed using a thematic model aligned with Entman’s framework. The study reveals that CNN International consistently employed a narrative frame of “Celebration and Trepidation.” The media defined the core problem as the precarity of the truce and the high risk of failure due to structural uncertainties (disarmament, governance). The cause of the current success was attributed to US-led diplomacy, while the cause of the uncertainty was rooted in historical failures and the complexity of the political endgame. The media made a moral judgment through strategic empathy, balancing the joy of Israeli hostage families with the mass casualties in Gaza, and proposed solutions centered on logistical control and sustained US leadership for the transition and reconstruction phases. The implication of these findings for language studies is that discourse linguistics and critical discourse analysis (CDA) are effective tools for uncovering the strategic construction of balance and the subtle ideological biases in news texts. By analyzing narrative structure and contrasting emotional language, we demonstrate how language not only reports political realities but also shapes public perceptions of risk and governance in post-conflict scenarios.
Co-Authors Muhammad Nur Syarif Hidayatullah, Muhammad