Kuznetsov, Michael
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Psychohistory and Psychopoetics Freudian Roots and Ancient Greek Symbolism Kuznetsov, Michael
Educational Psychology Journal Vol. 14 No. 2 (2025): December 2025
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/epj.v14i2.34082

Abstract

What if the grand tapestry of history, traditionally woven by kings and treaties, is instead driven by the subterranean currents of unconscious desires and childhood traumas? This article probes these hidden forces through the interdisciplinary frameworks of psychohistory and psychopoetics, offering a provocative reimagining of human agency and cultural evolution. The inquiry commences with a rigorous psychoanalytic examination of Sigmund Freud and Ludwig Jekels’ 1914 study, Der Wendepunkt im Leben Napoleons I, which dissects Napoleon Bonaparte’s meteoric rise through the lens of early familial dynamics and paraphilic tendencies—ranging from voyeurism to sadomasochism—rooted in his idolization of Pasquale Paoli. This seminal work prefigured psychohistory, formalized by Erik Erikson in 1958, as a method to unravel history as the enactment of repressed psychic conflicts and collective fantasies, challenging conventional historiography. The exploration deepens with an incisive analysis of Greek mythology’s primordial narratives, where the androgynous Aether begets Uranus and Gaia, initiating a cosmic drama of castration and rebellion. This foundational mythos crystallizes the Oedipus and Electra complexes, establishing archetypal psychic structures that underpin Western identity and patriarchal ascendancy. Turning to psychopoetics, this study decodes the symbolic lexicon of ancient Greek culture, interrogating how color gradations—blue for divine allegiance, red for martial fervor, green for sensual rebirth—embody unconscious fears and aspirations. Study propose an innovative expansion of psychopoetics, integrating color semiotics with genetic, economic, and linguistic determinants, to illuminate the phylogenetic imprint of civilizations. This approach not only redefines cultural analysis but also underscores the irreversible trajectory of history, shaped by the magnetic influence of visionary leaders and the enduring hypnosis of mass psychology.
Aleksey Khomyakov: Arsitek Pembaruan Ortodoks dan Pemikiran Rusia Kuznetsov, Michael
JIA (Jurnal Ilmu Agama) Vol 27 No 1 (2026): Jurnal Ilmu Agama : Mengkaji Doktrin, Pemikiran, dan Fenomena Agama
Publisher : Fakultas Ushuluddin dan Pemikiran Islam Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Fatah Palembang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19109/jia.v27i1.31164

Abstract

This study explores the intellectual legacy of Aleksey Stepanovich Khomyakov (1804–1860), a foundational thinker in 19th-century Russian Orthodox theology whose concept of sobornost'—communal unity in freedom and love—critiqued Western rationalism and individualism. The background highlights the historical tensions between Eastern Orthodox communal spirituality and Western individualistic traditions amid Russia's modernization. The objective is to analyze how Khomyakov's lay theology, rooted in Orthodox bogoslovie, reinterprets patristic sources to address modern fragmentation and proposes Russia as a messianic Third Rome. Employing hermeneutic and comparative textual analysis of Khomyakov’s primary works (e.g., “The Church is One”) alongside their reception in 20th–21st century scholarship (Lossky, Berdyaev, Florovsky, Zenkovsky), the study demonstrates that his synthesis of vita contemplativa and activa democratized religious discourse. The findings reveal sobornost' as a blueprint for societal wholeness through love-driven unity, offering insights for contemporary interdisciplinary religious studies. In conclusion, Khomyakov’s thought provides a valuable corrective to modern social alienation and fragmentation. This study contributes to enriching the study of communal theology by presenting a conceptual reinterpretation of sobornost as an alternative paradigm to modern individualism through an examination of Khomyakov's thought in interpreting the contemporary crisis of social solidarity. Furthermore, this study offers a new conceptual framework for global religious studies in understanding the relationship between spirituality, community, and collective identity in the modern era.