Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal International Journal of Financial, Accounting, and Management SocioHumania: Journal of Social Humanities Studies
Azizov, Elman
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Humanities Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Strengthening environmental, social, and governance accountability in international financial institutions Azizov, Elman; Azizli, Aytan
International Journal of Financial, Accounting, and Management Vol. 7 No. 3 (2025): December
Publisher : Goodwood Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35912/ijfam.v7i3.3579

Abstract

Purpose: This study examines how international financial institutions (IFIs) integrate accountability for environmental, social, and governance (ESG) issues into financial governance and decision-making. It assesses whether existing frameworks translate sustainability commitments into binding oversight or primarily function as legitimacy tools in global finance. Methodology/Approach: A qualitative comparative analysis was conducted using policy frameworks, evaluation reports, audit findings, and peer-reviewed research from 2018–2025. Legitimacy theory and principal–agent dynamics guided interpretation, supported by a coding matrix reviewing rule design, monitoring scope, stakeholder engagement, and data verifiability. Results/Findings: Findings show that sustainability standards are increasingly embedded in institutional mandates, but implementation remains uneven. Environmental integration is the most advanced, while social safeguards are limited by resourcing and political constraints. Governance accountability remains restricted by institutional mandates. Digital monitoring tools improve oversight but raise concerns about ethical design and unequal technical capacity. Conclusions: ESG frameworks within IFIs provide strong normative commitments but lack binding enforcement. This creates a persistent gap between institutional ambition and operational practice. Stronger accountability requires harmonized metrics, independent verification, and participatory mechanisms capable of converting transparency into enforceable oversight. Limitations: Limited access to internal deliberations and the lack of longitudinal community-level data constrain assessments of long-term effectiveness. Contribution: The study links normative expectations behind ESG accountability with operational control mechanisms in IFIs. It proposes a reform agenda emphasizing mandatory disclosure, independent oversight bodies, and inclusive monitoring systems—framing ESG accountability as a shift from voluntary transparency to enforceable stewardship in global finance.
Advancing Climate Justice in Fiscal Governance: Redesigning Accountability Frameworks in Global Climate Finance Azizov, Elman
SocioHumania: Journal of Social Humanities Studies Vol 2 No 2 (2025): SocioHumania: Journal of Social Humanities Studies
Publisher : Pusat Riset dan Inovasi Nasional Mabadi Iqtishad Al Islami

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70063/sociohumania.v2i2.126

Abstract

This study examines how climate justice principles can be integrated into fiscal governance frameworks to enhance accountability within global climate finance. As climate change intensifies economic vulnerabilities, particularly in developing countries, the allocation and oversight of climate finance have become critical determinants of equity and resilience. Current fiscal oversight mechanisms exhibit notable progress in transparency but remain insufficient in addressing fairness, distributive justice, and participation. Through a comparative institutional analysis of global financial institutions, national budget systems, and emerging technological tools, this study identifies persistent challenges—including fragmented accountability structures, lack of standardized reporting mechanisms, and political-economy dynamics that hinder equitable funding flows. The findings emphasize that climate finance often prioritizes procedural compliance over transformative outcomes, limiting its potential to reduce structural inequalities and build adaptive capacity. The study argues that accountability frameworks must evolve beyond conventional financial auditing, incorporating social and environmental metrics that reflect the moral imperatives of climate justice. By integrating participatory governance, digital innovations, and harmonized reporting standards, fiscal systems can foster more transparent, just, and impactful climate finance. This research contributes to the discourse on climate governance by proposing accountability reforms capable of linking financial decision-making with ethical considerations, thereby advancing global efforts toward a fair and resilient climate transition.
Co-Authors Azizli, Aytan