Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal REVELATIA: Jurnal Ilmu al-Qur`an dan Tafsir
Mukhtar, Ahmad Syahrul
Unknown Affiliation
Religion

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

 1 
Kritik terhadap Unsur Tafsir Ad-Dakhĭl: : Studi atas Penafsiran Ibn ‘Uṡaimin terhadap Q.S. Al- Al-Māidah (5): 64 Mukhtar, Ahmad Syahrul
REVELATIA Jurnal Ilmu al-Qur`an dan Tafsir Vol. 6 No. 2 (2025)
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Madura

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19105/revelatia.v6i2.20539

Abstract

The study of Qur’anic exegesis is generally divided into two categories: interpretations considered sound (al-aṣĭl) and ṡose regarded as deviant (ad-dakhĭl). Every exegete’s work inevitably reflects this distinction. This study aims to investigates al-‘Uṡaymĭn’s interpretation of Surah al-Mā’idah verse 64 in Aḥkām min al-Qur'ān al-Karĭm. In interpreting this verse, he does not employ ta’wĭl (figurative reinterpretation). Instead, he prioritizes a textual reading, avoiding taḥrĭf (distortion of meaning), ta‘ṭĭl (negation), takyĭf (describing ṡe modality of God’s attributes), tamṡĭl (likeness), or tashbĭh (anṡropomorphism). Al-‘Uṡaymĭn is a follower of the teachings of Muḥammad ibn ‘Abd al-Wahhāb (Wahhabism). Within Wahhabi doctrine, the use of rational interpretation for the mutashābihāt (ambiguous verses) is generally rejected. This research employs a descriptive qualitative method with theory of al-dakhĭl and al-aṣĭl to investigates the validity of his interpretation. This study found that al-Uṡaimin’s interpretation on al-Maidah: 64 indicates as deviant (al-dakhĭl). This is due to his rejection of ta’wĭl and the influence of Wahhabism, which tends to promote literalism and is associated with tajsĭm, tashbĭh, takyĭf, and tamṡĭl. His interpretation relies too rigidly on the outward literal meaning while dismissing the direct use of reason in interpreting ambiguous verses.
Co-Authors