Sultan Novaliyana Putra
Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Sosialisasi dan Edukasi: Membangun Kesadaran Anti-Bullying untuk Generasi Muda Andini Nurul Syahfitri; Jasmine Az-zahra; Lutfi Hasbulloh; Muhammad Haidar Pasha; Sultan Novaliyana Putra
Jurnal Sosial Humaniora dan Pendidikan Vol 1 No 2 (2025): November: Jurnal Sosial Humaniora dan Pendidikan: Scripta Humanika
Publisher : CV SCRIPTA INTELEKTUAL MANDIRI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.65310/1dshy436

Abstract

Bullying and juvenile delinquency are social phenomena that have serious implications for students’ psychological, emotional, and social development, while also affecting the overall school climate and the quality of future generations. These conditions necessitate systematic and sustainable preventive efforts. The socialization program conducted at SMP Syamsul Ulum, Cigending, Ujung Berung District, Bandung City, was organized in response to this need, with the primary aim of enhancing students’ awareness, knowledge, and skills in preventing bullying and juvenile delinquency. The program was implemented through interactive socialization methods, participatory discussions, and continuous mentoring designed to encourage active student engagement. The results demonstrated a significant improvement in students’ understanding of the definitions, forms, impacts, and handling strategies related to bullying and juvenile delinquency. Moreover, positive behavioral changes were observed, including reduced conflict, improved healthy communication, and the growth of mutual respect among students. A symbolic activity involving colorful handprints on a banner served as a collective declaration of commitment to combating bullying. Overall, the program proved effective in fostering a safe, conducive, and supportive school environment. Therefore, similar initiatives are strongly recommended for replication in other schools to strengthen the character and integrity of Indonesia’s youth.    
A Comparison of Administrative Dispute Resolution Through The Administrative Court and The Ombudsman (Examining The Differences In Functions, Authority, and Effectiveness of The Two Institutions) Allisya Destari Pratami; Hani Sri Handayani; Raihan Hadi Prama; Sultan Novaliyana Putra
Journal of Human Interaction and Social Studies Vol. 1 No. 2 (2026): : May: Sapientia Diversalis: Journal of Human Interaction and Social Studies
Publisher : CV SCRIPTA INTELEKTUAL MANDIRI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.65310/btwp4267

Abstract

This study examines and compares the Administrative Court and the Ombudsman as two principal institutions for resolving administrative disputes in Indonesia. The research employs a non empirical normative legal approach using statutory and conceptual methods to analyze legal norms, institutional mandates, and doctrinal principles governing both institutions. Primary legal materials consist of legislation regulating administrative courts, the Ombudsman, and public services, while secondary materials include scholarly literature on administrative law, administrative justice, and public accountability. The findings demonstrate that the Administrative Court functions as a judicial institution focused on legal adjudication and the provision of binding decisions, whereas the Ombudsman operates as a supervisory institution emphasizing maladministration review, complaint handling, and corrective recommendations. The analysis further reveals substantial differences in jurisdictional authority, legal powers, enforcement capacity, and legal consequences of institutional outcomes. The Administrative Court offers stronger legal certainty through enforceable judgments, while the Ombudsman provides greater accessibility, procedural flexibility, and responsiveness. The study concludes that both institutions perform complementary roles within Indonesia’s administrative justice system and collectively contribute to accountability, legal protection, good governance, and the improvement of public administration.
Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi atas Pencemaran dan Perusakan Lingkungan: Studi Normatif terhadap Prinsip Strict Liability di Indonesia Rafli Ramdani; Chandra Devaraihan Wahyudi; Sultan Novaliyana Putra
Journal of Legal, Political, and Humanistic Inquiry Vol 1 No 2 (2025): December: Custodia: Journal of Legal, Political, and Humanistic Inquiry
Publisher : CV SCRIPTA INTELEKTUAL MANDIRI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.65310/3ehsvm94

Abstract

Corporations play a vital role in economic development, yet massive industrialization often negatively impacts environmental sustainability. This article examines the legal construction of corporate criminal liability in environmental crimes in Indonesia. The research focuses on the paradigm shift from "societas delinquere non potest" to recognizing corporations as subjects of criminal law, as well as analyzing the application of Law No. 32 of 2009 concerning Environmental Protection and Management (UU PPLH) and Supreme Court Regulation (PERMA) No. 13 of 2016. The research method used is normative juridical. The discussion results indicate that corporate criminal liability is absolutely necessary to provide a deterrent effect and environmental remediation. The application of the Strict Liability principle and identification theory are crucial instruments for law enforcement to prosecute corporations, not only at the field operator level but also the directing mind or corporate management.