Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Metadata Management in the Digital Age: A Qualitative Approach to Practices and Challenges in Modern Organizations Silvia Meiliandari; Muhammad Irwan Padli Nasution; Hairul Anam
Jurnal Cendikia ISNU SU Vol. 2 No. 2 (2025): ISNU Cendikia September
Publisher : ISNU Sumatera Utara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70826/jcisnu.v2i2.843

Abstract

In the era of massive digital transformation, organizations across various sectors face significant challenges in managing increasingly complex and growing volumes of data. Metadata, as descriptive information about data, plays a central role in ensuring that data can be found, understood, and reused appropriately. Metadata management not only assists in managing digital archives but also serves as the foundation for effective and efficient data governance. This study aims to explore metadata management practices in five modern organizations from the government, private sector, and nongovernmental organizations. Using a qualitative approach with in-depth interviews, system observations, and documentation studies, this study identifies the extent of metadata understanding, implementation, and challenges in real-world work environments. The results indicate that most organizations still face gaps in standardization, system interoperability, and human resource digital literacy. This study also suggests the need for a national metadata strategy and ongoing training to encourage optimal metadata utilization across all organizational levels.
Legal Analysis Regarding Efforts to Annul the Decision Arbitration in District Court Hairul Anam; Atisa; Naziera Al Hadar; Rahma Seliati Br Sitorus; Tasya Alifiya
ISNU Nine-Star Multidisciplinary Journal Vol. 2 No. 2 (2025): ISNU Nine Star September 2025
Publisher : ISNU Sumatera Utara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70826/ins9mj.v2i2.805

Abstract

Arbitration is an alternative dispute resolution outside the court (non-litigation) that is final and binding on the parties. However, in practice, arbitration decisions can still be annulled at the District Court based on certain reasons stipulated in the law. This study aims to analyze the legal basis, procedures, and considerations of judges in deciding on requests to annul arbitration decisions at the District Court. The research method used is a normative legal approach with secondary data sources in the form of laws and regulations, court decisions, and related legal literature. The results of the study indicate that efforts to annul arbitration decisions are regulated in Article 70 of Law Number 30 of 1999 concerning Arbitration and Alternative Dispute Resolution, which requires the presence of certain elements such as alleged forged documents, concealment of important documents, or decisions based on deception. In addition, annulment can only be submitted within a maximum period of 30 days after the decision is received. The District Court's decision on an annulment request is final, but it still leaves room for legal uncertainty and inconsistent application of norms by judges. Therefore, there is a need for a strengthened legal system and more consistent standards of interpretation in the annulment process for arbitration awards.