Markus Gunawan
Batam University, Batam, Kepulauan Riau, Indonesia

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Juridical analysis of abandoned shares in the process of changing the status of a public company to a private company Herry Wahyu Andradjadi; Erniyanti Erniyanti; Markus Gunawan
Annals of Justice and Humanity Vol. 4 No. 2 (2025): June
Publisher : Goodwood Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35912/ajh.v4i2.3420

Abstract

Purpose: This study aims to analyze the legal framework, practical implementation, challenges, and possible solutions related to stranded shares in the process of converting a public limited liability company (PT) into a private PT (go private). Methodology: A normative juridical approach was applied by examining relevant legal instruments, including the Company Law, Capital Market Law, and OJK regulations. An empirical juridical approach was also employed through interviews with notaries, OJK officials, capital market practitioners, and case studies of issuers facing obstacles due to stranded shares. Results: The findings indicate that the absence of specific regulations regarding the classification and settlement of stranded shares significantly hampers the achievement of the General Meeting of Shareholders (GMS) quorum and obstructs the effectiveness of tender offers. Consequently, this condition delays the going private process and causes harm to active shareholders. Conclusion: Legal uncertainty resulting from unregulated stranded shares undermines corporate restructuring in the capital market. A comprehensive regulatory revision and enforcement mechanism are needed to address the issue effectively. Limitation: This research focuses on stranded shares in Indonesia’s capital market and does not provide comparative perspectives from other jurisdictions, which may offer alternative mechanisms. Contribution: This study enriches academic discourse and provides policy recommendations by highlighting the need for regulatory reform, the establishment of judicial remedies to exclude inactive shares, and investor education. It contributes to strengthening legal certainty and stakeholder protection in corporate governance.
Juridical analysis of legal protection for creditors on the validity of the Power of Attorney to Encumber Mortgage (SKMHT) executed before a notary from the perspective of security law Metta Tjia; Markus Gunawan; Irpan Husein Lubis
Annals of Justice and Humanity Vol. 4 No. 2 (2025): June
Publisher : Goodwood Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35912/ajh.v4i2.3421

Abstract

Purpose: This study analyzes the legal protection of creditors regarding the validity of the Power of Attorney to Encumber Mortgage Rights (Surat Kuasa Membebankan Hak Tanggungan/SKMHT) made before a Notary. It specifically examines differences in SKMHT formats between Notaries and Land Deed Officials (PPAT) and their implications for creditor protection and integration with land registration systems. Methodology: A descriptive juridical-sociological approach was employed, combining normative legal analysis with empirical research. Data collection involved statutory and literature reviews as well as field research, including interviews with notaries, PPATs, and land office officials. Results: The study reveals that creditor protection in Indonesia remains fragmented under several legal instruments such as the Civil Code, Mortgage Law, Banking Law, and Notary Law. Land offices generally require SKMHTs to comply with formats issued by the Head of the National Land Agency for integration with the electronic mortgage system (HT-el), creating challenges for SKMHTs drafted by Notaries. Conclusion: The research concludes that harmonization between the Notary Law and agrarian laws is essential to ensure uniform recognition of SKMHTs across institutions, thereby strengthening legal certainty for creditors and improving the effectiveness of the electronic mortgage registration system. Limitation: The study is limited to SKMHT implementation in Indonesia and does not include a comparative assessment with other jurisdictions. Contribution: This research contributes by identifying regulatory gaps and offering harmonization measures to reinforce creditor protection, improve procedural uniformity, and support the effective operation of the electronic mortgage registration framework.