Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik (JIHHP)
Ali Abdullah
Universitas Pancasila Jakarta, Indonesia
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Perlindungan Hukum Atas Publikasi Negatif Identitas Notaris Oleh Media Massa dalam Menghadapi Kasus Hukum Pidana di Pengadilan Esmeralda Aurelia Gracia; Ali Abdullah
Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik Vol. 5 No. 6 (2025): (JIHHP) Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik
Publisher : Dinasti Review Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jihhp.v5i6.5734

Abstract

Publikasi identitas notaris oleh media massa sebelum putusan pengadilan berkekuatan hukum tetap merupakan permasalahan krusial dalam sistem hukum Indonesia. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode yuridis normatif untuk menganalisis praktik publikasi media, kerangka hukum perlindungan, dan dampak psikososial terhadap profesi notaris. Melalui studi pustaka komprehensif, penelitian mengeksplorasi kompleksitas perlindungan identitas notaris dalam konteks hukum dan media massa. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa publikasi prematur melanggar prinsip praduga tak bersalah, merusak integritas profesional, dan menimbulkan stigmatisasi sosial berkepanjangan. Kerangka hukum Indonesia memiliki kelemahan struktural dalam melindungi identitas profesional, ditandai dengan ketidakjelasan mekanisme perlindungan dan lemahnya sanksi hukum. Penelitian merekomendasikan penguatan regulasi, pembentukan tim pengawas lintas lembaga, pengembangan protokol etika media, dan program edukasi berkelanjutan. Pendekatan multidisipliner yang mensinergikan berbagai pemangku kepentingan diperlukan untuk melindungi martabat dan integritas profesi hukum di Indonesia.
Legal Protection for Notaries in Reporting Money Laundering Crimes Using the Whistleblower Protection Model in Indonesia Ali Abdullah; Suhendar; Rini Meliana; Muhammad Sirajuddin Qahtan Hamdan
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 24 No. 2 (2025): Pena Justisia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/pj.v24i2.7114

Abstract

The notary profession, as a public official authorized to create authentic deeds, is often vulnerable to money laundering cases due to the complexity of client transactions that cannot be fully verified. This study aims to analyze the concept of legal protection for notaries in money laundering cases and optimize the role of whistleblower protection as an effective protection instrument. The research method uses a normative juridical approach with an analysis of laws and regulations, court decisions, and comparative studies of protection systems in other countries. The results show that existing legal protection mechanisms, such as the approval of the Regional Notary Honorary Council (MKNW) and the Witness and Victim Protection Law, are still weak because they are procedural and unresponsive to the complexity of money laundering cases. Notaries face a dilemma between the obligation to report suspicious transactions and the principle of client confidentiality, plus the application of the burdensome principle of reverse burden of proof. Optimizing whistleblower protection requires the reconstruction of a comprehensive legal framework through regulatory amendments, including the Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP) and other regulations to provide protection for notaries. This can be done by establishing a Legal Profession Protection Agency, developing special reporting protocols, and an inter-institutional integration system. The ideal protection model should provide legal immunity for whistleblowers in good faith, guarantee identity confidentiality, and a compensation mechanism for notaries who suffer losses due to the implementation of professional obligations.
Co-Authors Esmeralda Aurelia Gracia Muhammad Sirajuddin Qahtan Hamdan Rini Meliana Suhendar