Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Edutainment : Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan dan Kependidikan
Eddy Saud
Universitas Islam Ogan Komering Ilir Kayuagung
Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Mathematics Other

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

 1 
ENGINEERING APTITUDE-MECHANICAL REASONING OF ENGINEERING STUDENTS: RASCH ANALYSIS Firdaus MS; Eddy Saud
Edutainment Vol 12 No 2 (2024): Edutainment : Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan dan Kependidikan
Publisher : UNMUHBABEL Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35438/e.v12i2.927

Abstract

It is necessary to conduct an analysis with accurate and current modeling regarding engineering aptitude-mechanical Reasoning. Therefore, this study aims to analyze the aptitude-mechanical reasoning technique with Rasch analysis. This study is a quantitative study with a cross-sectional study design. This study was conducted at the Faculty of Engineering, Ogan Komering Ilir Kayuagung Islamic University (UNISKI). The subjects of this study were selected by purposive sampling, so the number of participants in this study was 62 engineering students. The instrument used in this study was an adoption test from MacKellar's book entitled Mechanical, Spatial, Abstract Reasoning. The research data were analyzed using the RASCH Model Analysis using the WINSTEP application. Based on the validity and reliability analysis results, the instrument for measuring engineering aptitude in this study was valid and matched the characteristics of Rasch modelling. The fit/suitability test results with Rasch modelling showed that only 1 participant did not meet two criteria, so they were classified as unfit. The results of the DIF analysis showed that the item that experienced bias with a probability of 0.0002 <0.05 was item number 17; it was seen that the item was straightforward to answer by the mechanical engineering study program, resulting in data bias between the two study programs. The results of the LVP analysis show that the engineering aptitude category is dominated by the moderate category, 73.07% for mechanical engineering study programs and 77.14% for civil engineering study programs.
Co-Authors MS, Firdaus