Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

AI-Driven tools and their influence on project decision-making in U.S. technology enterprises Umme Zinia Zahan Nodia; Md Minar Hossain; Falguni Rahman; Md Mehedi Hasan Antor; Mohammad Tahmid Ahmed
Global Academy of Multidisciplinary Studies Vol. 2 No. 1 (2025): August
Publisher : Goodwood Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35912/gams.v2i1.3599

Abstract

Purpose: This study investigates the impact of AI-driven tools on project decision-making in U.S. information technology (IT) companies, focusing on the roles of predictive analytics, natural language processing (NLP) assistants, and AI dashboards in improving decision quality, project outcomes, and stakeholder collaboration. Research Methodology: A mixed-methods design combining a systematic literature review and an empirical survey was used. Data were collected from project managers at major U.S. IT firms, including Microsoft, Oracle, and Google, who utilize AI-enabled platforms such as Microsoft Project, Jira, and IBM Watson. Quantitative data were analyzed through regression modeling and descriptive statistics, while qualitative insights were examined using thematic analysis. Results: The results show that AI technologies significantly improve the accuracy of project decision-making, minimize budget deviations, and strengthen cross-team communication. Predictive analytics enhanced early risk identification, NLP assistants streamlined scheduling and reporting, and AI dashboards increased real-time visibility and stakeholder engagement. Companies demonstrating higher AI maturity achieved superior performance across key project indicators. Conclusions: Integrating AI into project management enhances decision-making by combining automation with data-driven intelligence. Strategic AI adoption improves efficiency, reduces scope creep, and boosts managerial satisfaction within U.S. IT contexts. Limitations: The study focuses exclusively on large U.S.-based IT firms, limiting its applicability to smaller or global enterprises. The rapid evolution of AI restricts long-term generalization. Contribution: This research enriches project management and information systems literature by contextualizing AI’s role in high-tech decision-making and offering practical guidance for managers, executives, and policymakers driving digital transformation.
Determinants and consequences of share repurchases: Evidence from U.S. public firms Md Minar Hossain; Umme Zinia Zahan Nodia; Falguni Rahman; Md Mehedi Hasan Antor; Mohammad Tahmid Ahmed; Farhana Akter Priya
Global Academy of Multidisciplinary Studies Vol. 2 No. 2 (2025): November
Publisher : Goodwood Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35912/gams.v2i2.3668

Abstract

Purpose: This study investigates the underlying motivations behind share repurchases by U.S. companies and evaluates their impact on firm performance. It specifically explores financial conditions, managerial incentives, and market-related factors that drive buyback decisions, as well as the short- and long-term consequences for shareholders. Methodology/Approach: A quantitative, deductive approach is applied using data from publicly listed U.S. firms. Secondary data are sourced from Compustat, CRSP, ExecuComp, Bloomberg, and SEC filings. The analysis employs panel regressions, event-study methods, and multiple robustness checks conducted with statistical software such as Stata or R. Results/Findings: The findings indicate that free cash flow availability and perceived stock undervaluation are the most influential determinants of repurchases. Buyback announcements produce positive short-term market reactions, and firms demonstrate subsequent improvements in ROE and EPS. Nevertheless, share repurchases do not consistently enhance long-term abnormal stock returns. The results also show no significant reduction in investment, R&D, or employment, implying that buybacks are typically financed through excess liquidity. Conclusions: Share repurchases primarily function as a mechanism for capital allocation rather than a substitute for productive investment. While they generate short-term value for shareholders, their long-term effects tend to be neutral. Limitations: The study is restricted to U.S. firms and a specific time frame, and endogeneity concerns remain despite methodological controls. Contribution: This research advances understanding of buyback motives and outcomes, offering insights for managers, investors, and policymakers in evaluating repurchase strategies.