Nur Fitriana
Universitas PTIQ Jakarta

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Gender Justice and Liberation in the Interpretation of the Qur'an: A New Reading of Q.S. 4: 34 Ahmad Hamdani; Nur Fitriana; Baharuddin
Al-'Allāmah: Journal of Scriptures and Ulama Studies Vol. 2 No. 2 (2025): Gender Justice and Women’s Rights in Qur’anic and Islamic Studies
Publisher : The Ulama Cadre Education Program of Great Mosques of Istiqlal (PKUMI)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70017/al-allmah.v2i2.40

Abstract

This article explores the reinterpretation of Qur'an 4:34 through a comparative analysis of two contemporary Islamic hermeneutical models: Fazlur Rahman's ethical-historical “double movement” and Farid Esack's liberationist approach. This article aims to respond to the continued misuse of this verse to justify patriarchal authority and domestic violence, particularly in Muslim-majority societies. Using qualitative textual analysis, this study examines the socio-historical context of the verse and its ethical implications, as understood by Rahman, along with Esack's emphasis on social justice, victim-centered exegesis, and advocacy for the mustad‘afīn (the oppressed). This research highlights how both scholars reject literalist readings and advocate for justice-centered interpretations that align with the Qur’anic values of compassion (rahmah) and justice (‘adl). Rahman's methodology provides a historical reconstruction that invalidates wife beating in a modern context, while Esack's liberation theology redefines nushūz and centers Qur'anic exegesis on the dignity of marginalized individuals. The synthesis of their models has been shown to support reform in Islamic education, gender-inclusive curricula, and anti-violence legal policies. These findings underscore that integrating ethical and liberation paradigms can produce a dynamic and socially responsive hermeneutics of the Qur'an. This approach contributes to contemporary Islamic scholarship by offering a theological foundation for gender justice and promoting interpretations that are contextually grounded and ethically empowering.
TRAINING ISLAM DAN BUDAYA LOKAL: TAFSIR QS AL-BAQARAH:177 DALAM GAGASAN PRIBUMISASI ISLAM ABDURRAHMAN WAHID DI HIMPUNAN MAHASISWA YAYASAN AL-KAHFI Kholilurrohman Kholilurrohman; Nur Fitriana; Amira Fauziah; Sunarto Sunarto; Aldomi Putra; Enok Ghosiyah
MADANI Abdimas : Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat Vol. 4 No. 1 (2024): MADANI Abdimas | Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat
Publisher : MPP: Lembaga Penelitian Dan Studi Kebijakan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This study explores the integration of universal Islamic values with local culture through an analysis of the interpretation of QS Al-Baqarah verse 177 within the framework of Islamic indigenization (pribumisasi Islam) as conceptualized by Abdurrahman Wahid (Gus Dur). The verse is chosen for its emphasis on the principles of al-birr (righteousness), which encompasses not only theological aspects but also social and humanistic dimensions. Using a qualitative approach through literature review, this research examines how Gus Dur interprets righteousness as concrete social action and how he articulates these values within the pluralistic context of Indonesian society. The findings indicate that Gus Dur views QS Al-Baqarah:177 as theological justification for the integration of Islamic teachings and local culture, where values such as justice, equality, and solidarity with the marginalized serve as the foundation of social ethic
Gender Justice and Liberation in the Interpretation of the Qur'an: A New Reading of Q.S. 4: 34 Ahmad Hamdani; Nur Fitriana; Baharuddin
Al-'Allāmah: Journal of Scriptures and Ulama Studies Vol. 2 No. 2 (2025): Gender Justice and Women’s Rights in Qur’anic and Islamic Studies
Publisher : The Ulama Cadre Education Program of Great Mosques of Istiqlal (PKUMI)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70017/al-allmah.v2i2.40

Abstract

This article explores the reinterpretation of Qur'an 4:34 through a comparative analysis of two contemporary Islamic hermeneutical models: Fazlur Rahman's ethical-historical “double movement” and Farid Esack's liberationist approach. This article aims to respond to the continued misuse of this verse to justify patriarchal authority and domestic violence, particularly in Muslim-majority societies. Using qualitative textual analysis, this study examines the socio-historical context of the verse and its ethical implications, as understood by Rahman, along with Esack's emphasis on social justice, victim-centered exegesis, and advocacy for the mustad‘afīn (the oppressed). This research highlights how both scholars reject literalist readings and advocate for justice-centered interpretations that align with the Qur’anic values of compassion (rahmah) and justice (‘adl). Rahman's methodology provides a historical reconstruction that invalidates wife beating in a modern context, while Esack's liberation theology redefines nushūz and centers Qur'anic exegesis on the dignity of marginalized individuals. The synthesis of their models has been shown to support reform in Islamic education, gender-inclusive curricula, and anti-violence legal policies. These findings underscore that integrating ethical and liberation paradigms can produce a dynamic and socially responsive hermeneutics of the Qur'an. This approach contributes to contemporary Islamic scholarship by offering a theological foundation for gender justice and promoting interpretations that are contextually grounded and ethically empowering.