Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal JURNAL ILMIAH ADVOKASI Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities
Ali Abdullah
Universitas Pancasila Jakarta
Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
UPAYA HUKUM DAN PEMULIHAN HAK SAHAM MINORITAS PASCA PUTUSAN PENGADILAN: STUDI ATAS PERLINDUNGAN INVESTOR DI INDONESIA Ali Abdullah; Liesmawati Liesmawati
Jurnal Ilmiah Advokasi Vol 13, No 4 (2025): Jurnal Ilmiah Advokasi
Publisher : Universitas Labuhanbatu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36987/jiad.v13i4.7869

Abstract

Restoration of minority shareholder rights in private limited companies is often ineffective, despite court decisions confirming a breach of fiduciary duty. This situation indicates a gap between the legal protection norms in Law Number 40 of 2007 concerning Limited Liability Companies and their implementation in practice. This study analyzes the effectiveness of the mechanism for restoring minority shareholder rights following a court decision. The results show that court decisions are generally declarative and poorly enforced, making them difficult to implement. Key obstacles include resistance from majority shareholders, weak institutional coordination, and low transparency in private companies. This study recommends the formulation of more operational rulings, strengthening implementation oversight, and integrating legal technology with a restorative justice approach. Using a juridical-empirical approach, this study contributes to strengthening legal protection for minority shareholders and increasing legal certainty in corporate practice.Keywords: Minority Shareholders, Fiduciary Duty, Legal Remedies
Juridical Analysis of the Use of a Power of Attorney to Sell Made Before a Notary that Gives Rise to the Criminal Act of Money Laundering (Case Study of Decision Number 248/Pid.B/2022/PN JKT.Brt) Alinda Julietha Adnan; Ali Abdullah
Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities Vol. 6 No. 5 (2026): (JLPH) Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities
Publisher : Dinasti Research

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jlph.v6i5.3314

Abstract

This research is motivated by the misuse of a power of attorney to sell made before a notary without the presence and consent of the legally entitled party, whereby the deed was subsequently used as the basis for the unlawful transfer of land rights. This issue is important to examine because notarial deeds and deeds made by Land Deed Officials possess strong evidentiary value, yet in practice they may be misused to create the appearance of legality for transactions that are in fact contrary to law. This study aims to analyze the legal standing of a power of attorney to sell in relation to a deed made before a notary without the presence of the parties, as well as to analyze the use of such power of attorney that may give rise to the criminal act of money laundering. This research employs normative legal research using statutory and case approaches. The object of this study is the Decision of the West Jakarta District Court Number 248/Pid.B/2022/PN Jkt.Brt, examined through primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. The data were obtained through library research and analyzed qualitatively by connecting legal provisions, doctrines, and legal facts contained in the court decision. The results of the study indicate that a power of attorney to sell made without the presence of the parties does not fulfill the formal requirements of an authentic deed, as the notary is unable to verify the identity, intention, and consent of the grantor. Such a deed may lose its authentic evidentiary force and may be challenged as the basis for the transfer of land rights. Furthermore, the unlawful use of a power of attorney to sell may serve as a means to transfer, conceal, or disguise the origin of assets derived from criminal acts, particularly when certificates that have been transferred into another name are subsequently pledged as collateral, sold, or used to obtain economic benefit. These findings affirm that violations of deed-making procedures may affect the validity of a transaction and give rise to criminal liability.
Co-Authors Alinda Julietha Adnan Liesmawati Liesmawati