Sri Wahyudi
Universitas Doktor Nugroho Magetan

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

EMBEDDING ACADEMIC LITERACY WITHIN INCLUSIVE PEDAGOGY IN SPECIAL EDUCATION TEACHER EDUCATION: A QUALITATIVE STUDY IN AN INDONESIAN UNIVERSITY Sri Wahyudi; Nur Hidayat Cahyono
EDUCATIONE Volume 4, Issue 1, January 2026
Publisher : CV. TOTUS TUUS

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59397/edu.v4i1.211

Abstract

Inclusive teaching in higher education is increasingly required to accommodate diverse student profiles, particularly in special education teacher education where candidates must internalize and model inclusive values. However, academic literacy (e.g., reading scholarly texts, constructing evidence-based arguments, and writing systematically) is often uneven among students and is frequently treated as a separate skill rather than integrated into inclusive pedagogy. This study aimed to analyze how inclusive learning strategies are integrated with academic literacy strengthening in a special education course and to examine their implications for learning processes and outcomes. Using a qualitative descriptive design, data were collected through classroom observations, in-depth semi-structured interviews with lecturers and students, and document analysis of syllabi, lesson plans, learning materials, and student assignments. Data were analyzed through iterative reduction, display, and conclusion drawing, supported by method and source triangulation. Findings indicate that integrating inclusive pedagogy with explicit academic literacy practices increased student engagement, improved conceptual understanding, and strengthened critical and reflective thinking. Flexible and collaborative learning designs expanded equitable participation across students with varied backgrounds and abilities, while literacy-based tasks enhanced students’ capacity to interpret scholarly sources and communicate ideas more rigorously. The study concludes that this integration is both feasible and pedagogically valuable for improving instructional quality and professional readiness in special education teacher preparation. Implications include the need for curriculum-level alignment of inclusive strategies with structured literacy scaffolds and formative feedback. Future research should test the model across institutions using mixed methods and longitudinal designs to examine sustained academic and professional impacts.
PANCASILA-INTEGRATED ENTREPRENEURSHIP LEARNING AND UNIVERSITY STUDENTS' ENTREPRENEURIAL INTENTION Nur Hidayat Cahyono; Sri Wahyudi
EDUCATIONE Volume 4, Issue 2, July 2026
Publisher : CV. TOTUS TUUS

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59397/edu.v4i2.309

Abstract

Values-based entrepreneurship learning may strengthen students' willingness to pursue entrepreneurship, but its effects should be distinguished from unmeasured ethical or behavioral outcomes. This study evaluated a Pancasila-integrated entrepreneurship learning intervention using a quasi-experimental pretest-posttest control-group design. Eighty students in two intact university classes were included (experimental group, n = 40; control group, n = 40); students were not individually randomized. The reported outcome was a self-reported entrepreneurial-intention score. Because individual-level data were unavailable, the revision reanalyzed the reported summary statistics through baseline comparison, paired changes, and a between-group Welch comparison of change scores, with confidence intervals and effect sizes. Pretest means were comparable (68.45 vs. 67.98; p = .754). Mean intention increased by 16.28 points in the experimental group and 5.56 points in the control group. The between-group difference in change was 10.72 points, 95% CI [7.33, 14.11], t(76.00) = 6.29, p < .001, Hedges' g = 1.39. Thus, exposure to the integrated condition was associated with a larger short-term increase in entrepreneurial intention. The study did not directly measure ethical awareness, social responsibility, entrepreneurial competence, or actual venture behavior; these remain proposed mechanisms and future outcomes rather than demonstrated effects.