Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.882
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Tafaqquh: Jurnal Penelitian Dan Kajian Keislaman JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW Multidiciplinary Output Research for Actual and International Issue (Morfai Journal) Jejak digital: Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin
Surya Sukti
Universitas Islam Negeri Palangkaraya
Religion Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Chemical Engineering, Chemistry & Bioengineering Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Energy Engineering Environmental Science Health Professions Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Materials Science & Nanotechnology Social Sciences Other

Published : 5 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 5 Documents
Search

 1 
THE ROLE OF THE KATINGAN REGENCY GOVERNMENT TOWARDS ILLEGAL GOLD MINERS IN HAMPALIT VILLAGE Novi Lidiyasari; Surya Sukti; Sabarudin Ahmad
Multidiciplinary Output Research For Actual and International Issue (MORFAI) Vol. 5 No. 6 (2025): Multidiciplinary Output Research For Actual and International Issue
Publisher : RADJA PUBLIKA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54443/morfai.v5i6.3507

Abstract

The rise of Unlicensed Gold Mining (PETI) activities in Hampalit Village, Katingan Regency, has created an environmental crisis and complex socio-economic dilemmas. Regional policies such as Katingan Regent Regulation No. 44 of 2023 have not been able to effectively overcome this problem, mainly because of the community's dependence on mining as the main livelihood and the limited regional authority after the enactment of the Minerba Law. Using empirical and sociolegal legal approaches, this study examines the dynamics of the policy and its implementation through literature studies, legal documentation, and in-depth interviews with the Environmental Agency, community leaders, law enforcement officials, and local miners. The results show that despite efforts to curb mining and environmental rehabilitation programs, weak synergies between levels of government and the lack of viable economic alternatives are the main obstacles. A sustainable strategy that includes the establishment of a People's Mining Area (WPR), local economic empowerment, and more adaptive regulatory coordination between local, provincial, and central governments is needed to create a fair, legal, and environmentally friendly solution to PETI practices in this region.
Relasi Islam dan Politik Menurut Pemikiran Abdurrahman Wahid dan Muhammad Amien Rais Hilyatul Azkia; Rifda Nur Miftahuromah; Surya Sukti
Tafáqquh: Jurnal Penelitian Dan Kajian Keislaman Vol. 14 No. 1 (2026): Juni
Publisher : INSTITUT AGAMA ISLAM BANI FATTAH (IAIBAFA)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52431/tafaqquh.v14i1.4506

Abstract

Islamic political thought in Indonesia has evolved in line with social dynamics and the need for a democratic system that is not solely oriented toward power, but also toward moral and religious values. This study aims to analyze the relationship between Islam and politics in the thinking of Abdurrahman Wahid and Amien Rais, as well as their contributions to building an inclusive and democratic political system. The method used is a qualitative literature study approach through a review of various relevant scientific sources. The results show that both figures reject the formalization of Islam as a state ideology but emphasize the importance of Islamic values ​​as an ethical foundation in political life. Gus Dur views Islam as a social ethic that supports pluralism, democracy, and humanity, while Amien Rais emphasizes the concept of social monotheism as a moral basis for realizing justice and prosperity. Thus, their thinking demonstrates that Islam can coexist harmoniously with modern democracy without having to be realized in the form of a formal Islamic state.
Negara Ideal : Menurut Pemikiran Muhammad Natsir dan Soekarno Utin Dila Mantajai; Selvani Selvani; Umu Habibah; Surya Sukti
Jejak digital: Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin Vol. 2 No. 4 (2026): JUNI-JULI
Publisher : INDO PUBLISHING

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.63822/md2fgp37

Abstract

This study examines the concept of an ideal state according to the thoughts of Muhammad Natsir and Soekarno, who have fundamental differences in their views on the relationship between religion and the state. The research problem focuses on how these two figures formulate the concept of an ideal state and what the similarities and differences are. This study uses a qualitative method with a literature review approach, analyzing various sources such as books and academic journals. The results show that Muhammad Natsir views the state as an instrument to implement Islamic values in governance, making religion and state inseparable. In contrast, Soekarno emphasizes the importance of separating religion and state to maintain unity in a diverse society and avoid the politicization of religion. Despite these differences, both thinkers share the same goal: to establish a just, prosperous, and welfareoriented state. Therefore, the ideas of these two figures provide significant insights into understanding the concept of an ideal state in the Indonesian context.
Term Limitations for State Power Ahmad Rizani; Aziz Saputra; Juang Aulia Akbar; Zulfian Achmad Noviandi; Surya Sukti
Jejak digital: Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin Vol. 2 No. 4 (2026): JUNI-JULI
Publisher : INDO PUBLISHING

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.63822/f1pe7c31

Abstract

This study examines the fundamental concepts of authority and legitimacy within the framework of introductory legal studies, along with their practical implications in the operation of modern states. Authority is understood as legally grounded power exercised by state institutions within clearly defined limits, while legitimacy refers to the societal acceptance that justifies such power. The discussion highlights that authority cannot function effectively without legitimacy, and legitimacy itself depends on the lawful and responsible exercise of authority. Furthermore, the paper explores the limitations imposed on state administrators, emphasizing principles such as legality, the rule of law, separation of powers, human rights protection, accountability, and ethical considerations as essential safeguards against the abuse of power. In addition, it analyzes various sources of legitimacy, including legal procedures, public consent, cultural traditions, governmental performance, moral integrity, and international recognition. The study also underscores the importance of term limits as a mechanism to prevent the concentration of power, encourage leadership renewal, and strengthen accountability within governance systems. Overall, the findings demonstrate that a stable and just legal system requires a balanced relationship between authority, legitimacy, and institutional constraints, ensuring that power is exercised responsibly and in accordance with the public interest.
Peran Lembaga Adat Dayak Dalam Penyelesaian Tindak Asusila Perspektif Hukum Nasional Muhamad Sahdan Siregar; Surya Sukti; Reza Noor Ihsan
JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW Vol. 9 No. 2 (2026): JUNE
Publisher : Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/julr.v9i2.13989

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the role of Dayak customary institutions in resolving cases of sexual misconduct and to understand the mechanisms of their settlement in relation to the national legal system in Indonesia. This research is motivated by the practice within Dayak indigenous communities where certain disputes are not only resolved through state legal mechanisms but also through customary law that emphasizes the restoration of social relations within the community. This condition reflects the dynamics of legal pluralism in Indonesia, making it important to examine how the authority of customary institutions is exercised in society. This study employs an empirical legal research method with a qualitative approach, using field data collected through interviews with customary leaders, village officials, and community members who understand the practice of customary dispute resolution. The field data are further supported by literature studies and relevant statutory regulations. The results of the study indicate that Dayak customary institutions play a significant role in resolving cases through customary deliberation mechanisms involving customary leaders, the parties concerned, and members of the local community. The resolution process is carried out through the imposition of customary sanctions and efforts to restore social harmony as a manifestation of restorative justice principles within indigenous communities. The novelty of this study lies in its analysis of the practice of dispute resolution by Dayak customary institutions and its implications for the harmonization of customary law and national law within the framework of legal pluralism in Indonesia.     Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis peran lembaga adat Dayak dalam penyelesaian perkara asusila serta memahami mekanisme penyelesaiannya dalam kaitannya dengan sistem hukum nasional di Indonesia. Penelitian ini dilatarbelakangi oleh praktik penyelesaian perkara dalam masyarakat adat Dayak yang tidak hanya dilakukan melalui mekanisme hukum negara, tetapi juga melalui hukum adat yang menekankan pemulihan hubungan sosial dalam komunitas. Kondisi tersebut menunjukkan adanya dinamika dalam praktik pluralisme hukum di Indonesia sehingga perlu dikaji bagaimana kewenangan lembaga adat dijalankan dalam masyarakat. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum empiris dengan pendekatan kualitatif, melalui pengumpulan data lapangan berupa wawancara dengan tokoh adat, aparat desa, serta masyarakat yang memahami praktik penyelesaian perkara adat, yang kemudian didukung dengan studi kepustakaan dan peraturan perundang-undangan terkait. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa lembaga adat Dayak memiliki peran penting dalam menyelesaikan perkara melalui mekanisme musyawarah adat yang melibatkan tokoh adat, pihak yang bersengketa, serta masyarakat setempat. Penyelesaian tersebut dilakukan melalui pemberian sanksi adat dan upaya pemulihan hubungan sosial sebagai bentuk penerapan prinsip keadilan restoratif dalam masyarakat adat. Kebaruan penelitian ini terletak pada analisis mengenai praktik penyelesaian perkara oleh lembaga adat Dayak serta implikasinya terhadap upaya harmonisasi antara hukum adat dan hukum nasional dalam kerangka pluralisme hukum di Indonesia.
Co-Authors Ahmad Rizani Aziz Saputra Hilyatul Azkia Juang Aulia Akbar Muhamad Sahdan Siregar Novi Lidiyasari Reza Noor Ihsan Rifda Nur Miftahuromah Sabarudin Ahmad Selvani Selvani Umu Habibah Utin Dila Mantajai Zulfian Achmad Noviandi