Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

THE ROLE OF THE KATINGAN REGENCY GOVERNMENT TOWARDS ILLEGAL GOLD MINERS IN HAMPALIT VILLAGE Novi Lidiyasari; Surya Sukti; Sabarudin Ahmad
Multidiciplinary Output Research For Actual and International Issue (MORFAI) Vol. 5 No. 6 (2025): Multidiciplinary Output Research For Actual and International Issue
Publisher : RADJA PUBLIKA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54443/morfai.v5i6.3507

Abstract

The rise of Unlicensed Gold Mining (PETI) activities in Hampalit Village, Katingan Regency, has created an environmental crisis and complex socio-economic dilemmas. Regional policies such as Katingan Regent Regulation No. 44 of 2023 have not been able to effectively overcome this problem, mainly because of the community's dependence on mining as the main livelihood and the limited regional authority after the enactment of the Minerba Law. Using empirical and sociolegal legal approaches, this study examines the dynamics of the policy and its implementation through literature studies, legal documentation, and in-depth interviews with the Environmental Agency, community leaders, law enforcement officials, and local miners. The results show that despite efforts to curb mining and environmental rehabilitation programs, weak synergies between levels of government and the lack of viable economic alternatives are the main obstacles. A sustainable strategy that includes the establishment of a People's Mining Area (WPR), local economic empowerment, and more adaptive regulatory coordination between local, provincial, and central governments is needed to create a fair, legal, and environmentally friendly solution to PETI practices in this region.
Relasi Islam dan Politik Menurut Pemikiran Abdurrahman Wahid dan Muhammad Amien Rais Hilyatul Azkia; Rifda Nur Miftahuromah; Surya Sukti
Tafáqquh: Jurnal Penelitian Dan Kajian Keislaman Vol. 14 No. 1 (2026): Juni
Publisher : INSTITUT AGAMA ISLAM BANI FATTAH (IAIBAFA)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52431/tafaqquh.v14i1.4506

Abstract

Islamic political thought in Indonesia has evolved in line with social dynamics and the need for a democratic system that is not solely oriented toward power, but also toward moral and religious values. This study aims to analyze the relationship between Islam and politics in the thinking of Abdurrahman Wahid and Amien Rais, as well as their contributions to building an inclusive and democratic political system. The method used is a qualitative literature study approach through a review of various relevant scientific sources. The results show that both figures reject the formalization of Islam as a state ideology but emphasize the importance of Islamic values ​​as an ethical foundation in political life. Gus Dur views Islam as a social ethic that supports pluralism, democracy, and humanity, while Amien Rais emphasizes the concept of social monotheism as a moral basis for realizing justice and prosperity. Thus, their thinking demonstrates that Islam can coexist harmoniously with modern democracy without having to be realized in the form of a formal Islamic state.
Negara Ideal : Menurut Pemikiran Muhammad Natsir dan Soekarno Utin Dila Mantajai; Selvani Selvani; Umu Habibah; Surya Sukti
Jejak digital: Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin Vol. 2 No. 4 (2026): JUNI-JULI
Publisher : INDO PUBLISHING

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.63822/md2fgp37

Abstract

This study examines the concept of an ideal state according to the thoughts of Muhammad Natsir and Soekarno, who have fundamental differences in their views on the relationship between religion and the state. The research problem focuses on how these two figures formulate the concept of an ideal state and what the similarities and differences are. This study uses a qualitative method with a literature review approach, analyzing various sources such as books and academic journals. The results show that Muhammad Natsir views the state as an instrument to implement Islamic values in governance, making religion and state inseparable. In contrast, Soekarno emphasizes the importance of separating religion and state to maintain unity in a diverse society and avoid the politicization of religion. Despite these differences, both thinkers share the same goal: to establish a just, prosperous, and welfareoriented state. Therefore, the ideas of these two figures provide significant insights into understanding the concept of an ideal state in the Indonesian context.
Term Limitations for State Power Ahmad Rizani; Aziz Saputra; Juang Aulia Akbar; Zulfian Achmad Noviandi; Surya Sukti
Jejak digital: Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin Vol. 2 No. 4 (2026): JUNI-JULI
Publisher : INDO PUBLISHING

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.63822/f1pe7c31

Abstract

This study examines the fundamental concepts of authority and legitimacy within the framework of introductory legal studies, along with their practical implications in the operation of modern states. Authority is understood as legally grounded power exercised by state institutions within clearly defined limits, while legitimacy refers to the societal acceptance that justifies such power. The discussion highlights that authority cannot function effectively without legitimacy, and legitimacy itself depends on the lawful and responsible exercise of authority. Furthermore, the paper explores the limitations imposed on state administrators, emphasizing principles such as legality, the rule of law, separation of powers, human rights protection, accountability, and ethical considerations as essential safeguards against the abuse of power. In addition, it analyzes various sources of legitimacy, including legal procedures, public consent, cultural traditions, governmental performance, moral integrity, and international recognition. The study also underscores the importance of term limits as a mechanism to prevent the concentration of power, encourage leadership renewal, and strengthen accountability within governance systems. Overall, the findings demonstrate that a stable and just legal system requires a balanced relationship between authority, legitimacy, and institutional constraints, ensuring that power is exercised responsibly and in accordance with the public interest.