Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Multidiciplinary Output Research for Actual and International Issue (Morfai Journal)
Patnuaji Agus Indrarto
Universitas Indonesia
Religion Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Chemical Engineering, Chemistry & Bioengineering Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Energy Engineering Environmental Science Health Professions Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Materials Science & Nanotechnology Social Sciences Other

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

 1 
ASSESSING THE READINESS OF THE INDONESIAN OMBUDSMAN FOR IMPLEMENTING DATA-DRIVEN DECISION MAKING Patnuaji Agus Indrarto; Eko Prasojo
Multidiciplinary Output Research For Actual and International Issue (MORFAI) Vol. 6 No. 1 (2026): Multidiciplinary Output Research For Actual and International Issue
Publisher : RADJA PUBLIKA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54443/morfai.v6i1.4723

Abstract

The Ombudsman of the Republic of Indonesia increasingly faces demands to base judgments on reliable evidence, yet many remain constrained by fragmented information systems and uneven analytical practices. This study addresses the practical problem of how prepared the Ombudsman of the Republic of Indonesia is to adopt data-driven decision making (DDDM), and the conceptual problem of limited understanding of how DDDM manifests within external complaint-handling bodies. The research employs the DECAS framework, which conceptualizes DDDM across five dimensions (Decision-Making Process, Decision Maker, Decision, Data, and Analytics) to assess organizational readiness. A qualitative exploratory design was used, drawing on nine semi-structured interviews with senior leaders, technical units, and regional representatives. Directed content analysis was applied to evaluate routines, data governance, and analytical capabilities. Findings show that although data increasingly support operational monitoring, leadership-level decisions still rely heavily on intuition due to descriptive, inconsistent, and siloed information. Analytical fluency varies across organizational tiers, and workflows for preparing and synthesizing data remain manual. Despite managing extensive datasets and expanding its digital infrastructure, the institution has not yet reached maturity for systematic DDDM. The study concludes that strengthened protocols, improved data governance, and more integrated analytical capacity are essential for enabling consistent evidence-based oversight.
Co-Authors Eko Prasojo