Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Hukum Indonesia Kertha Wicara: Journal Ilmu Hukum
I Dewa Ayu Dwi Mayasari
Udayana University
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN PELAKU USAHA TERHADAP KONSUMEN PENGGUNA SKINCARE OVERCLAIM Hening Rahayu Parasanti; I Dewa Ayu Dwi Mayasari
Kertha Wicara: Journal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 16 No. 1 (2026)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Tujuan dari penyususnan jurnal berikut guna menganalisis hingga menemukan jawaban atas pertanggungjawaban pengusaha terhadap  konsumen. pengguna produk skincare overclaim mengandung zat berbahaya. Promosi skincare overclaim ini sudah menjadi kebiasaan para pengusaha agar produk laku terjual di masyarakat, yang mana sering kali menimbulakan kerugian terhadap konsumen. Dalam penyusunan penulis menggunakan metode peneleitian yuridis normatif yang pendekatannya dengan undang-indang terkait. Penelitian ini merujuk pada pertanggungjawaban pengusaha dalam perspektif peraturan BPOM dan Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1999 tentang Perlindungan Konsumen. Serta guna menjawab permasalahan terkait perlindungan hukum kepada  pengguna skincare overclaim. Seharusnya pengusaha wajib mengikuti standarisasi yang dibuat oleh BPOM guna menjaga keselamatan dan kesehatan konsumen. Pengusaha yang terbukti melakukan hal tersebut dapat dipidana penjara dan denda yang tercantum dalam pengaturan Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1999 tentang Perlindungan Konsumen. Kata Kunci : Perlindungan Konsumen, Skincare, Overclaim, Pertanggungjawaban Hukum   ABSTRACT   The purpose of compiling the following journal is to analyze and find answers regarding the entrepreneur's accountability toward consumers, particularly regarding skincare products that overclaim to contain harmful substances. The promotion of these overclaim skincare products has become a common practice among entrepreneurs to make their products sell in the market, which often leads to consumer losses. In this writing, the author uses a normative legal research method, approaching relevant laws and regulations. This research refers to the accountability of entrepreneurs in the perspective of BPOM regulations and Law Number 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection. It also aims to address issues related to legal protection for users of overclaim skincare products. Entrepreneurs should comply with the standards set by BPOM to ensure consumer safety and health. Entrepreneurs proven to commit such acts may face imprisonment and fines as stipulated in Law Number 8. Keywords: Consumer Protection, Skincare, Overclaim, Legal Liability
A Juridical Analysis of Effectiveness Cohabitation in Indonesia and Netherlands Made Wahyu Artha Sedana; I Dewa Ayu Dwi Mayasari
Jurnal Hukum Indonesia Vol. 5 No. 2 (2026): Jurnal Hukum Indonesia
Publisher : Riviera Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58344/jhi.v5i2.2572

Abstract

This research examines the regulation of the criminal act of cohabitation under Article 412 of the New Indonesian Penal Code and its implications for social life, the criminal justice system, women’s protection, population administration, and national legal reform. The criminalization of cohabitation, framed as an absolute complaint-based offense, reflects a moralistic approach by the state in regulating intimate relationships and family life while simultaneously expanding state intervention into the private sphere. This research employs a normative juridical method with conceptual, statutory, and comparative approaches to assess the alignment of the regulation with legal certainty, human rights protection, and the dynamics of a pluralistic society. The research further analyzes whether the criminalization of cohabitation in Indonesia aligns with contemporary human rights standards, the principles of proportionality and legal certainty, and the doctrine of ultimum remedium in criminal law policy. Moreover, the criminal regulation of cohabitation in Indonesia reflects a moralistic approach that potentially intrudes into the private sphere and risks conflicting with human rights principles, particularly in a pluralistic society. In contrast, the Netherlands adopts a restraint-based and facilitative legal model that respects individual autonomy and privacy while ensuring legal protection through non-penal instruments. This study concludes that the protection of social values and family integrity does not necessarily require criminal sanctions and that alternative regulatory approaches may offer a more proportional, fair, and human rights compliant framework.
Co-Authors Hening Rahayu Parasanti Made Wahyu Artha Sedana