Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Pembaharuan Hukum Lex Publica
Anto Kustanto
Universitas Wahid Hasyim, Indonesia
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation (SLAPP) From Indonesian Law Perspective Putri Mayessa Vegatasia Soetiyono; Yunia Estisari; Shambawa Dharma Raditya; Samaya Dharma Mandala; Anto Kustanto
Lex Publica Vol. 12 No. 1 (2025)
Publisher : APPTHI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58829/lp.12.1.2025.296

Abstract

This study analyzes the practice of Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation (SLAPP) in Indonesia, highlighting national legal loopholes that enable strategic litigation to suppress public participation. The research’s novelty lies in a comprehensive evaluation of Indonesian legal provisions and the proposal of innovative legal strategies for prevention, including the integration of anti-SLAPP principles into non-sectoral procedural reforms. A normative juridical approach is combined with comparative methods, comparing anti-SLAPP practices in the United States and the United Kingdom to identify effective models of legal protection. Qualitative-descriptive data analysis, including the Bangka Belitung High Court decision Number 21/Pid/2021/PT BBL and PT KLM’s lawsuit against IPB academics, demonstrates that SLAPPs impose financial, psychological, and social burdens on activists, journalists, and civil society organizations. The strategy for preventing and handling SLAPPs must be holistic, encompassing the development of an anti-SLAPP bill, revisions to the criminal procedure code, strengthening the ITE Law and the public information disclosure law, and training judges to recognize indicators of strategic lawsuits.
The Urgency of Implementing a Core Tax Administration System in Tax Law Reform in the Fintech Era Hary Kesowo Wibowo; Anto Kustanto; Ainul Masruroh
Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum Vol 13, No 1 (2026): Jurnal pembaharuan Hukum
Publisher : UNISSULA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26532/jph.v13i1.52493

Abstract

The rapid expansion of Financial Technology (FinTech) has transformed digital economic transactions and created challenges for tax administration, requiring reforms that ensure legal certainty, effective supervision, and equitable tax collection. This study examines the legal urgency of implementing the Core Tax Administration System (CTAS) as part of Indonesia’s tax law reform in the FinTech era. Using a qualitative descriptive design with a normative legal approach, the research analyzes Law Number 6 of 1983 as amended by Law Number 7 of 2021 on the Harmonization of Tax Regulations, Government Regulation Number 55 of 2022, policy documents, institutional reports, and relevant legal literature. The findings identify three legal urgencies. First, tax regulations require reconstruction to support an integrated digital administration system that provides legal certainty and accommodates technological developments. Second, CTAS strengthens tax collection by integrating taxpayer data, improving compliance, increasing administrative efficiency, and reducing tax avoidance. Third, modernization of tax administration promotes tax justice through transparent, accountable, and proportional tax obligations across conventional and digital sectors. The study concludes that successful CTAS implementation requires harmonization between tax regulations, digital governance, and personal data protection to establish an adaptive and equitable tax administration system supporting sustainable fiscal governance.
Co-Authors Ainul Masruroh Hary Kesowo Wibowo Putri Mayessa Vegatasia Soetiyono Samaya Dharma Mandala Shambawa Dharma Raditya Yunia Estisari