Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Stretagi Pengembangan UMKM Huyula Berbasis Collaborative Governance Dalam Mewujudkan Ekonomi Berkelanjutan di Desa Lembah Hijau Di Kecamatan Bonepantai Kabupaten Bone Bolango Sofyan Alhadar; Ria Anggita Zen M; Aling S. Pawawo; Abdul Rahmad Mohammad Yunus; Shikdar Mohammad Riazul
Solo International Collaboration and Publication of Social Sciences and Humanities Vol. 3 No. 03 (2025): Solo International Collaboration and Publication of Social Sciences and Humani
Publisher : Walidem Institute and Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61455/sicopus.v3i03.427

Abstract

Objective: This study aims to analyze the development strategy of Huyula Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises (MSMEs) based on collaborative governance to achieve a sustainable economy in Lembah Hijau Village, Bone Bolango Regency. Theoretical framework: The study is grounded on three main concepts: business development strategy, collaborative governance, and sustainable economy. Business strategy emphasizes innovation, managerial capacity, and digitalization; collaborative governance highlights multi-stakeholder collaboration; while sustainable economy integrates economic, and social. Literature review: Previous studies reveal that MSMEs are vital contributors to Indonesia’s economy, accounting for more than 60% of GDP and absorbing 97% of the workforce. However, they face challenges such as limited resources, weak managerial capacity, inadequate institutional infrastructure, and poor digital adoption. Methods: This research applies a descriptive qualitative approach, conducted over six months (June–October 2025). Data were collected through observation, semi-structured interviews with seven purposively selected informants (village government, community leaders, four MSME actors, and youth representatives), and focus group discussions (FGD). Results: The findings indicate that Huyula MSMEs remain at the start-up stage, constrained by managerial, marketing, and innovation limitations. Collaborative governance proved crucial, involving the village government as facilitator, MSME actors as innovators, local leaders as social legitimators, youth as digital promoters, and the private sectors as financing and distribution partners. The collaborative model strengthens human resource capacity, builds collective institutions, and integrates digital technology to expand market access. Implications: The study implies that collaborative governance fosters inclusive and sustainable economic practices, aligning with Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) 8 (Decent Work and Economic Growth) and 12 (Responsible Consumption and Production). Novelty: This research contributes by formulating an ideal model of MSME development based on collaborative governance at the village level, integrating managerial empowerment, institutional strengthening, and digitalization.
The Relevance of SDGs and Islamic Legal Principles in Divorce Cases to Judicial Reasoning Lukman Yafi; Shikdar Mohammad Riazul
Demak Universal Journal of Islam and Sharia Vol. 3 No. 02 (2025): Demak Universal Journal of Islam and Sharia
Publisher : Walidem Institute and Publishing (WIP)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61455/deujis.v3i02.480

Abstract

This study investigates the relevance of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and Islamic legal principles in shaping judicial reasoning in divorce by ṭalāq cases, with empirical attention directed toward a decision from the Selangor, Malaysia Religious Court. Objective: The primary objective is to examine how judicial reasoning incorporates Islamic legal norms, statutory requirements, and SDG commitments—particularly SDG 5 (Gender Equality), SDG 16 (Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions), and SDG 10 (Reduced Inequalities)—in ensuring procedural justice, fairness, and the protection of vulnerable parties in family law disputes. Theoretical framework: The analysis draws upon Islamic family law, emphasizing maṣlaḥah, justice, and judicial discretion, combined with legal positivism and socio-legal jurisprudence. This framework allows for understanding how judges interpret textual provisions while simultaneously addressing broader social objectives aligned with the SDGs. Literature review: Existing scholarship highlights the significance of judicial discretion in Islamic family law, the evolving social dimensions of divorce litigation, and the tension between formal rules and contextual considerations. However, limited research explicitly addresses the integration of SDG principles into judicial reasoning in Muslim-majority jurisdictions, revealing a gap that this study seeks to fill by linking global development commitments with Islamic judicial practice. Method: Using a qualitative descriptive design, the study analyzes primary data derived from judicial interviews and official court documents, supported by secondary materials such as statutory instruments, Islamic legal texts, and contemporary academic literature. Results: The findings show that judges in Selangor apply a balanced approach that upholds procedural legality while considering the psychological, economic, and social welfare of both spouses. Judicial reasoning demonstrates sensitivity to gender equality, equitable access to justice, and family well-being—aligning implicitly with SDGs—while firmly grounded in Islamic legal principles. The decision-making process reflects harmonization between legal certainty, maṣlaḥah, and the pursuit of substantive justice. Implications: The study offers practical insights for policymakers, legal practitioners, and scholars seeking to integrate SDG-aligned values into Islamic family law jurisprudence. Novelty: Its key contribution lies in articulating how SDG commitments and Islamic legal principles converge within judicial reasoning, offering a new analytical lens for understanding contemporary divorce adjudication in Muslim legal systems.