Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal The Journal of Indonesia Sustainable Development Planning (JISDeP)
Muhammad Arsad
Departement of Public Administration, Faculty of Administrative Science, Brawijaya University, Malang, Indonesia
Economics, Econometrics & Finance Energy Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

 1 
Unraveling Policy Overlaps in Indonesia’s National Development Planning System Muhammad Arsad; Irwan Noor; Firda Hidayati
The Journal of Indonesia Sustainable Development Planning Vol 6 No 3 (2025): December
Publisher : Pusbindiklatren Bappenas

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46456/jisdep.v6i3.907

Abstract

Indonesia's development governance faces persistent structural challenges: policy overlaps that undermine coherence in planning, performance management, and budgeting. This commentary adopts a systems level perspective to examine how fragmented mandates and institutional silos collectively shape governance complexity, directly affecting development outcomes at the subnational level while drawing lessons from international reform experiences. Indonesia's development planning architecture consists of the National Development Planning System (SPPN), the Government Performance Accountability System (SAKIP), and performance-based budgeting mechanisms. While established to enhance governance quality, public administration scholarship demonstrates that proliferating policy tools and institutional actors increase policy incoherence and institutional fragmentation (Peters, 2015). Indonesia's planning and performance systems evolve within separate institutional logics, creating what Moynihan (2008) conceptualizes as decoupled performance systems where planning, performance measurement, and budgeting remain insufficiently integrated. This fragmentation is reinforced by goal ambiguity (Rainey, 2009), as SPPN prioritizes development targets while SAKIP emphasizes organizational accountability. Fragmented approaches among key government bodies weaken interministerial coordination and exacerbate policy inconsistencies (O'Leary & Bingham, 2009). with this silo mentality being particularly evident in the Ministry of Home Affairs, the Ministry for Administrative and Bureaucratic Reform, and the Ministry of Finance.
Co-Authors Firda Hidayati Irwan Noor