Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis
Sudiyono Sudiyono
Universitas Islam Kalimantan MAB
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Tinjauan Yuridis terhadap Delik Aduan dalam Penegakan Hukum Hak Cipta berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 28 Tahun 2014 Lutfi Yusup Rahmathoni; Sri Herlina; Sudiyono Sudiyono; Ahmad Rizqi
Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis Vol 6 No 7 (2025): Tema Hukum Pidana
Publisher : CV Rewang Rencang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56370/jhlg.v6i7.1801

Abstract

This study examines the application of complaint offenses in copyright law enforcement under Law Number 28 of 2014 concerning Copyright. As part of intellectual property rights, copyright provides legal protection for creative works, enabling creators or rights holders to obtain both economic and moral benefits, and preventing violations such as piracy or unauthorized use. Based on Article 120 of the Copyright Law, most copyright violations are classified as complaint offenses, meaning that investigation and prosecution can only proceed if a complaint is filed by the creator, copyright holder, or an authorized party unless the violation harms the public interest, in which case it is treated as an ordinary crime. This study employs a descriptive-analytical approach to primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. The findings indicate that the regulation of complaint offenses offers flexibility for rights holders to choose between litigation and non-litigation resolution. However, implementation faces challenges such as proving ownership, lengthy legal processes, and the potential misuse of complaint withdrawals. In conclusion, applying the complaint offense mechanism to copyright law can balance the protection of individual rights with the public interest, but it requires stronger regulations and greater legal awareness to achieve more effective and equitable enforcement.
Penerapan Asas Pembuktian Terbalik dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana dalam Perkara Pencucian Uang di Indonesia Sri Herlina; Lutfi Yusup Rahmathoni; Sudiyono Sudiyono; Macario G. Gayeta
Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis Vol 6 No 7 (2025): Tema Hukum Pidana
Publisher : CV Rewang Rencang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56370/jhlg.v6i7.1805

Abstract

Money laundering is a serious crime that has a major impact on the economic stability and integrity of the country's financial system. This crime is generally associated with predicate offenses, such as corruption, narcotics, and organized crime, to conceal the origin of illicit wealth. In law enforcement, the application of the reverse burden of proof principle is a crucial strategy for overcoming the difficulty of proof. This study examines the application of the reverse burden of proof principle in the Indonesian criminal justice system, particularly in money laundering cases, as outlined in Law Number 8 of 2010. The method used is normative juridical with a conceptual and statutory approach. The results of the study indicate that the application of the reverse burden of proof principle can strengthen efforts to eradicate money laundering, but must still uphold the principle of fair trial and protection of human rights, especially the presumption of innocence. Law Number 8 of 2010 has not comprehensively regulated the standards of proof, verification, and legal impact of this principle, thus creating a vacuum of norms and legal uncertainty. In practice, the accused is only burdened to explain the origin of the wealth, while the prosecutor proves the elements of the crime. However, this shifting burden of proof still raises concerns about violations of the presumption of innocence. Therefore, the application of the reverse burden of proof principle requires more detailed legal regulations and strict supervision so that it is not misused and continues to guarantee legal justice for the accused.
Co-Authors Ahmad Rizqi Lutfi Yusup Rahmathoni Macario G. Gayeta Sri Herlina